Growing population is a big problem in developing countries. Should Government provide new homes in the cities or countryside.
Human population has seen a drastic increase in its number since the nineteenth century. Most importantly, the overgrowing population is one of the major causes of global warming. The growth in population also leads to a shortage of homes in many advancing countries like India. Now, the biggest question we have here is whether the higher authority should build new houses in the rural areas or in the city itself? This essay will discuss the pros and cons for both the options.
To begin with, many cities like Bangalore have seen an immense flow of people from varied places in the recent times and thus, it is intuitively obvious that there will be a shortage of homes. Therefore, the government should take necessary steps towards building new houses in the rural areas. There are various advantages to it. Firstly, suburban areas will get developed and equipped with all the facilities which most of the people dream of. Secondly, there will rise in job opportunities. Lastly, the housing prices will decrease. For example, a recent study done by the “Housing Association” showed that since 1990 the real estate department has seen a 200% rise in the housing price which definitely made owning a house very expensive.
On the other hand, rural development can also cause many problems such as deforestation can cause huge damage to our environment. Moreover, farmers depend on agricultural land and in fact it is the bread and butter of their life, so, construction on these lands will have an adverse effect on them. Furthermore, reduction in farming will have a detrimental effect on the world food ratio and will lead to food scarcity. For instance, a recent survey by the “Food and Research Department” proved that 60% of the world’s food demand is fulfilled by the agriculture and farming sector. Thus, it is evident that farming land should be preserved for the longevity of mankind.
To conclude, after analyzing all the possible aspects of the given argument it is obvious that the society needs more houses for the overgrowing population to be accommodated, however, more stress should be given in preserving the countryside by making use of other means of development.
- International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment.Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages? 89
- Some people think that rich countries should support poor countries in terms of aid for health care and education. To what extent do you agree. 84
- In some countries university students live at home with their families while they study, whereas in other countries students attend University in another city. Do you think the benefits of living far away from home during the university outweigh the disad 73
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.Why do you think this is happening?What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 73
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10164835165 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88018367055 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574175824176 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1483860444 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.166666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3888888889 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12499873388 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0370512045187 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417612253794 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759232640228 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421158590942 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.