It is better for young to get advice from older people than young people.
Do you agree or disagree?
At some point or the other, each individual needs a piece of advice from another person to deal with their confusion either in their personal or professional life. It is a popular belief that instead of youngsters, elders should be approached for better guidance. In this essay, I shall refer to some sociological studies and examples to support the general opinion.
To begin with, conventional wisdom has it that the older the wiser. In other words, people acquire an astronomical amount of knowledge as they grow, and learn numerous lessons about life from their own experiences. Therefore, youth benefits from the provision of long-term insight into outcomes of any decision they make, if enlightened by an elder. For instance, while choosing a career path, a teenager requires counseling by their teachers or parents rather than by their peers because they possess a wider spectrum of information regarding career prospects. Moreover, older people might even relate better to a child, if they had experienced a similar dilemma in their childhood. However, friends would not be adequately helpful in such situations.
In addition to this, old people have significantly better understanding skills as compared to the younger ones. Furthermore, it is a well-known fact that youngsters are impulsive. On the contrary, mature people have effective control over their minds and are mentally more stable. To exemplify, a recent study by Human Psychological Institute shows that teenagers make impulsive decisions, which may cause repercussions, whereas, adults are composed and make decisions with sensible thinking. Hence, the maturity of older people have superior influence over the youngsters if they take their advice, on the other hand, it could be precarious otherwise.
Having seen the above points, it can be concluded that advice by younger individuals could be inconvenient for the person. Conversely, it is incontrovertible that suggestions by elders are indeed far beneficial.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-27 | mahyarr | 87 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Tanny Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-03 | sonurapdia | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-12 | elham mousavi | 61 | view |
| 2020-12-29 | Rachana92 | 78 | view |
- With the increased global demand in oil and gas undiscovered areas of the world should be opened up to access more resources To what extent do you agree 78
- Most people agree that money cannot buy happiness Why is happiness difficult to define How can people achieve happiness 89
- Some people think that success is best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 78
- Young people now spend far too much time and money on following fashion trends such as technology and clothing to what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- Some people think that dangerous sports should be banned while others think that people should be free to choose Discuss both the views and give your opinion 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47572815534 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9991707501 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653721682848 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1948367318 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.75 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167411859199 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050395901213 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423281539735 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090982345953 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327986595195 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.