It is better for young to get advice from older people than young people.
Do you agree or disagree?
Sometimes youngsters seek advice to upgrade their lives. Although some people think youths should consult with the elderlies, others opine that young adults can do this better. I personally agree with the latter view and discuss my reasons in the following.
As for some reasons, firstly, youths have more or less the same taste. In fact, people who are in the same aged group have mostly similar beliefs and ambitions thus; they can give more suitable pieces of advice to their peers. Furthermore, in most cases, young adults encourage youth to experience new things, while the old people usually persuade them to be cautious. To illustrate this vividly, youth have got more got as they think they have more time a head of them to make mistakes and achieve whatever they want. In contrast, most old people become conservative as they feel fragile and feeble. Therefore, they may avoid youth to experience challenges in their lives.
Nevertheless, some people opposite with the above idea. To support their view, they mention that the seniors can hinder young people going astray and committing mistakes as they are a treasure of wisdom. In fact, they experienced numerous challenges in their lives. Therefore, they are more conscious which approaches are the best to become successful. Although this might be true to some extent, making mistakes is the key to the success. In fact, youths ought to encounter some challenges to bring fame and fortune in their lives.
To conclude, although, the elderlies have more experience and in most occasions, they wisely weigh all sides to give an appropriate advice, young adults usually suggest their peers to follow new challenges, which is essential for them to uplift their lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-27 | mahyarr | 87 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Tanny Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-03 | sonurapdia | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-12 | elham mousavi | 61 | view |
| 2020-12-29 | Rachana92 | 78 | view |
- Languages are dying out all the time The result of this is a world with fewer languages This is a good thing for people everywhere To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some believe that pupils should be given less homework others say the opposite What is your opinion 61
- In the past many people had skills such as making their own clothes and doing repairs to things in the house In many countries nowadays skills like these are disappearing 73
- Some people think that children should be involved in making school rules Others think that only adults can make school rules Discuss both points of view and give your own opinion 87
- Immigration has a major impact on the society What are the main reasons of immigration To what consequences can it lead 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sential for them to uplift their lives.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, as for, in contrast, in fact, in most cases, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09507042254 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50192100367 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528169014085 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2307509583 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4375 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155152233878 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566558305131 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588038093869 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111301864566 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517927238143 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sential for them to uplift their lives.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, as for, in contrast, in fact, in most cases, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09507042254 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50192100367 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528169014085 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2307509583 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4375 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155152233878 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566558305131 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588038093869 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111301864566 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517927238143 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.