It is generally accepted that families are not as closed as they used to be. Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together.
Families are considered as backbone in everybody’s life. But, it is observed that people are more disconnected from their loved ones when it is compared to past. Obviously, people leave very busy life which can be a major reason behind this connection. So people have to understand the importance of family in one’s life and expected to put efforts to repair broken relationships.
To begin with, the major reason behind such disconnection is work culture shift. In the past when only a few members of family used to engage in work, leave enough time to spend with families. However, now that most members of family are working due to increase in competitiveness for better living standards, people are working against the clock, resulting in insufficient time to bond with family. Thus, less they communicate, more they feel disconnected and eventually left with broken relationships. Not only work kept them occupied, but many of them staying far away from the family and hardly getting a chance to meet them in person. Consequently, families are gradually contracting to small size.
Nevertheless, the best and most effective way to nurture any relationship is to spend time with loved one by doing different recreational activities together, such as outing and picnics. For instance, having at least one meal together every day can initiates meaningful conversation that helps to create warmth relationship. Additionally, children must be taught the significant role that family plays in individual life, from the early age in order to create meaningful bond in the long run. Thus, connection among families can be easily improved by communication and hanging out together as a family.
In Conclusion, although it is difficult to provide sufficient time for family due to busy nature of life, it is not impossible. As it is said there is nothing broken beyond repair, same applies to family relationship if one understands its importance and willing to create closed bond.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | Surya Prakash | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | elham mousavi | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | Sinabri | 89 | view |
| 2018-06-25 | ajmeet | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-25 | sandip24 | 89 | view |
- Individual should take care of the environment or it is the government’s responsibility.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 92
- Some people think that large international sporting events only brings drawbacks, and that it is not worth hosting them.Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Your friend invited you for a meal with his/her family in their home. Write a letter and cover the following points:•Thank him/her and tell about the meal you enjoyed the most.•How you felt meeting your friend's family.•What else you liked about thi 87
- Your friend is coming to your city from overseas. write to him/her that you will not be able to accommodate him/her in your home. Include the following.- Give your reason & suggest him/her am alternate accommodation-Suggest a place and time for you to 73
- Nowadays people have free access to music and films online. Is this a positive or a negative development?Provide relevant examples from you own experience. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'initiate'
Suggestion: initiate
...t least one meal together every day can initiates meaningful conversation that helps to c...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, at least, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24375 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04405157644 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584375 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2103842309 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.875 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179774890501 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617297283467 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368011360998 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106584253244 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00636668109754 0.056905535591 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.