Nowadays, people argue that architects should attach more importance to the use and safety of constructions. Besides, it is pointless to design and construct such a beautiful one. I disagree with this opinion, and I believe that purpose serving is the basis of architecture, but the outside appearance of buildings meets the needs of architects and people in favor of it.
On the one hand, admittedly, I believe that there could be two reasons why some people focus on the underlying agenda. Firstly, it is evident that how to construct a build should be based on the functional approach. In other words, if the building structure could reach the requirements of comfort for residents, it is not likely to be productive. At the same time, taking sufficient safety measures during construction, another critical aspect required to accomplish the primary objective, are much more important than outlooks since individual life first, for instance, the Chinese government has established the strict housing safety standards, avoiding events such as house collapse.
On the other hand, however, I believe that the beautiful appearance of buildings shows the architects’ design style which is different among these designers. What encourages them to become an outstanding one is not only the purpose of meeting the basic requirements and ensuring the people’s security but also the pursuit of architectural beauty. During their further study, what they learn more is not how to build an original building, but to appreciate the famous buildings and then developing their style. Also, the sameness of architectures makes people feel bored. Plenty of buildings in the world are famous for their architectural style. Without these buildings, people would lose the chance to appreciate their beauty in various ways.
In conclusion, while it is crucial for building constructor to establish buildings considering function and security, I do not believe a variety of style belonging to architects should be abandoned.
- International travel makes people prejudiced rather than broad-minded. What are its causes and what measures can be taken to solve this problem? 67
- International travel makes people prejudiced rather than broad-minded. What are its causes and what measures can be taken to solve this problem? 89
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 73
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44126984127 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03888629797 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574603174603 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.8440728153 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.428571429 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263263934713 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883219452064 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692073269791 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17288401479 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341457932688 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.