Over the past years, environmental hazards have been on the surge and impacted life on earth detrimentally. It seems that the best workaround, therefore, is to sacrifice luxurious living for the betterment of the descendants. The fact cannot be denied that lifestyle changes are necessary, however, my opinion differs from the thought that sacrifices are needed for the benefit of the future generation.
To begin with, changes in routine life may not be onerous. For instance, the use of plastics has been banned by the government. Due to this declaration, shopkeepers have resorted to paper and cloth bags instead. As a matter of fact, this initiative has changed the living with no reduction in the comfort level. Another announcement made by the governing body is to limit the cutting of trees and policing paper use. People are advised to avoid wastage of paper and take double side print outs. This step, apparently, will help to save green spaces which in turn would benefit the environment.
Furthermore, the authority has also asked people to reduce the use of energy. Firstly, switching off lights when not necessary and unplug the chargers after use. It is a good practice to use energy resources limitedly. This will be advantageous for our pockets as well. Secondly, owning cars is considered indeed a symbol of high-standard status. But we should become aware that we are emitting greenhouse gases into the atmosphere with the high usage of vehicles. Nevertheless, the public is encouraged to travel through public transport and use cycles or pedestrian pathways for nearby places.
To conclude, these habitual modifications in day-to-day life would assist to decrease environmental issues. But, I deny the point that these substitutes would hamper the comfort level of the current generation. The truth is that the changes improve the standard of living of the current generation. They are creating a better world without making any compromise on their comforts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...crease environmental issues. But, I deny the point that these substitutes would h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, as a matter of fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22884012539 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87968531849 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623824451411 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0304337358 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.4285714286 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1904761905 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159982856302 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406810625106 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038175446759 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955230742637 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403863622613 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.46 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.