in many countries paying for things using mobile phones cell phone apps is becoming increasingly common Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages

Essay topics:

in many countries paying for things using mobile phones (cell phone ) apps is becoming increasingly common .Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages ?

Time and again, various forms of media highlighted the fact that paying bills from one's mobile is frequent than before. This practice has grabbed many eyeballs. I have, too, extrapolated some reasons which represent that this trend has more advantages than disadvantages, which I will elaborate in upcoming paragraphs with relevant examples.

To begin with, increasing use of technology has made our life lot easier and comfortable than ancient times. For example, before people had to wait in the lines to pay their electricity bills, which is nowadays pretty easy, they can pay it online through their phone. Other than that, human being's pocket were loaded with cash as there wasn't any service available like today. In recent days, we barely see people carrying money with them as by just tapping their cellular they can pay it.

Additionally, since living beings doesn't have to hold monetary with them, it has decreased crime rate overall, which is again a positive impact as a whole. To exemplify, study also proved that felony like individuals getting loot has been reduced over the years because of this upgrading technology. On the other hand, it is true that misdeed through hacking has increased as everyone saving all their important details in their phone to save time. However, this type of misconduct can be limited by restricting access to ones personal belonging.

To encapsulate, there are convincing empirical and anecdotal evidences to show that paying through mobile phones have plenty of pros which over weigh it's cons. I believe negative impact of it, can be overcome by taking few measures by oneself and government authorities.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-16 shahsajjad 61 view
2023-05-26 vinitpate2001@gmail.com 84 view
2022-08-15 yasaman-pooshidani 73 view
2022-06-11 minhhh123 84 view
2022-02-09 bilal_chaudhry 61 view
Essays by user vinitpate2001@… :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...lighted the fact that paying bills from ones mobile is frequent than before. This pr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...s pocket were loaded with cash as there wasnt any service available like today. In re...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...t. Additionally, since living beings doesnt have to hold monetary with them, it has...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, for example, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17472118959 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58135010974 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.695167286245 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1542669559 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.076923077 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182300657233 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588708070808 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443987997671 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106119245232 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216437758946 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.