In many countries, as people are earning more these days, they are also spending money in buying more and more items. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
As per the recent media report, the average per capita income of people had doubled in last 5 years. Thus, people are purchasing more products because they being paid more than in the past. I believe it is a positive progression because of numerous benefits to the nation and its people.
The main reason to agree that purchasing more products of beneficial because it aids to the country's economic growth. This is because when people spend money then their money is circulated back into the market, which is vital for the smooth functioning of the economy of a country. Additionally, the sales taxes, which are paid by the consumer at the time of purchase, flourish country's funds. For instance, as per the recent report by Harvard Business School, UK's economy is stronger than USA, from last 30 years, because citizen of UK spends more and citizens of USA do more savings.
Furthermore, on an individual level, by spending more, people are more happy and satisfied in their lives. This is because with more purchasing capabilities, people can not afford to buy more luxurious products to lead a comfortable life. As a result, people feel more contended with their improved living style because they can buy any product as per their needs. For instance, as per the happiness survey done by Times magazine, people of Canada stood first in the ranking. This is because they have high per capita and they can easily afford affluent lifestyle.
To conclude, people are getting more salaries and they are purchasing more products than ever before. I believe this is a pragmatic shift because it increases nation's economic growth and people can lead a happy lifestyle.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, then, thus, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9537366548 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54131400477 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53024911032 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6240245926 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.4285714286 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294874027215 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119487207406 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955140070865 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201227187434 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317140549253 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.