IN MANY COUNTRIES, VERY FEW YOUNG PEOPLE READ NEWSPAPERS OR FOLLOW THE NEWS ON TV. WHAT DO YOU THINK ARE THE CAUSES OF THIS? WHAT SOLUTIONS CAN YOU SUGGEST?
Due to the development of technology, youth is focusing less on general awareness. Reading newspapers or watching the television news, in large countries, is not being done by many youngsters. The multifarious causes of this notion along with solutions are discussed in this essay.
To begin with the causes, mostly youngsters are spending their most times on internet. Owing to this, they are using not only various sites such as Face-book and Twitter, but also playing online games on their mobiles namely Pub-G and Eight ball pool. This will, consequently, make them busy with these technology inventions and unable to read the news articles. Moreover, hard study routines of children are the other major reason of not following the news. Many students, especially the medical ones, are attending various tuition centers for different subjects, due to which they are left with no time for getting general awareness by watching news channels.
Nevertheless, there are different solutions which can be opted to handle this situation. Firstly, in schools, teachers should arrange competitive quizzes on current news of national and international level for children with fascinating rewards, which will ultimately help pupils to read newspapers and listen to different news articles, and will increase their general knowledge. Secondly, numerous social sites use by youngsters such as Face-book have to visualize the news articles in interactive ways that will take their interest to read more about that particular news. Hence, they will become aware of their surroundings and follow the news more.
To conclude, busy study timetables and use of social sites by youngsters are reasons for reading less news articles; however, efforts by teachers and showing news contents by social sites can help in large extent to increase the number of readers and viewers of newspaper and television respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-18 | Violet Osueke | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | Violet Osueke | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | prabhleenpreet kaur | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-09 | swyun14 | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-24 | Van Nguyen 8 | 56 | view |
- IN MANY COUNTRIES, VERY FEW YOUNG PEOPLE READ NEWSPAPERS OR FOLLOW THE NEWS ON TV. WHAT DO YOU THINK ARE THE CAUSES OF THIS? WHAT SOLUTIONS CAN YOU SUGGEST? 73
- IN GENERAL PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE SUCH A CLOSE RELATIONSHIP WITH THEIR NEIGHBORS AS COMPARED TO THE PAST? WHY THIS IS SO? AND WHAT CAN BE DONE TO IMPROVE THE CONTACT BETWEEN THE NEIGHBORS? 84
- SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT EXERCISE IS THE KEY TO HEALTH WHILE OTHERS FEEL THAT HAVING A BALANCED DIET IS MORE IMPORTANT.DISCUSS BOTH SIDES AND GIVE YOUR OPINION? 89
- THERE SEEMS TO BE AN INCREASING NUMBER OF SERIOUS CRIMES COMMITTED EACH YEAR. WHILE SOME THINK THE BEST WAY IS TO USE THE DEATH PENALTY AS A DETERRENT, MANY PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT OTHER MEASURES WILL BE NEEDED.DISCUSS BOTH SIDES. 67
- TOO MANY OLD HISTORIC BUILDINGS ARE IN DANGER AND DESTROYED IN MANY COUNTRIES WHAT ARE THE MAIN REASON HOW TO PROTECT THEM 52
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43771043771 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74057528104 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579124579125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.7800460848 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.230769231 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174631546588 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708623634792 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489224267748 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12152540841 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436632782822 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.