Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists, but not local people. Why this is the case? What can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
Museums has been a good source of information since ages. It’s been observed that major footfall in museum is of tourists instead of local population or natives. In my opinion, most of the museums provides the same experience over and again and we can renovate historical landmark as well as include technology to attract localities.
To begin with, there is no denying on the fact that our museums have the same ambiance for decades. It has been difficult to convince local popular to re-visit any monument as they have nothing new to explore and engage with. Usually most of them does not get a good feedback from their friend or relatives because of which they never think of visiting historical places again. For example, I’m a Delhiite and I’ve visited Red Fort when I was 5-year-old. Since then whenever someone visit there and they share the same details and experience that I had decades ago, eventually making it difficult for me to plan a visit to Red Fort.
On the other hand, if we renovate and embed technology then we can catch attention of native people. People will love to learn and perform old techniques attached to historical sites; it will help them in learning how people lived in the past. We can use technology where people can interact and learn through KIOSK’s about history associated with artifact and other relevant knowledge of that era. Additionally, once we have been installed then we can keep on updating information on them to cover wider hues of audience. Light and Sound show performed in Akshardham, is a best amalgamation of technology and information, provide information on how earth was created, and people are glued to it as they get feel connected with it. Thereby enabling them to visit over again.
To my mind, localities do not visit to museums or historical sites a s they get similar experience no matter how many times they visit. We can user technology as an helping aid and revive the lost touch/interest.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-11 | 1aja | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | 1aja | 84 | view |
| 2019-02-15 | whatever1031 | 61 | view |
| 2018-11-13 | vyhoang1992 | 73 | view |
- Stores should sell local food products and not the imported food products. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some say that the most important thing about being rich is that one has the opportunity to help others. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- People who read for pleasure have better imagination and language skills than those who prefer watching TV. To what extent do you agree? 84
- Many parents believe that when their children read book for entertainment, they are just wasting their time, and that they should read only serious, educational books. What is your opinion about this? 78
- Some people say the Olympic Games are not relevant in the 21st century. Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 494, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'visits'.
Suggestion: visits
...5-year-old. Since then whenever someone visit there and they share the same details a...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 578, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... Sound show performed in Akshardham, is a best amalgamation of technology and inf...
^
Line 13, column 68, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ot visit to museums or historical sites a s they get similar experience no matter...
^
Line 13, column 163, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...s they visit. We can user technology as an helping aid and revive the lost touch/i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, well, for example, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94047619048 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72444676768 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9132223112 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.75 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233938685937 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754876442679 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546562992188 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154483008764 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462661091997 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.