Many people believe that media coverage of celebrities is having a negative effect on children To what extent do you agree You should write at least 250 words

Essay topics:

Many people believe that media coverage of celebrities is having a negative effect on children.

To what extent do you agree?
You should write at least 250 words.

The use of television as a means of entertainment has increased tremendously during recent times. To captivate and entice their audience, news channels often telecast the happenings both good and bad in the lives of famous people like Hollywood actors, politicians etc. who are loved by the common people. This has a tremendous impact on the minds of children especially the youth who look up to the celebrities as role models. This essay agrees with the statement that media coverage of famous people does have an impact on children. This essay will first look at the negative impact on lifestyle and then discuss the negative impact on behaviour.
People who are famous have a lavish lifestyle. They have the means and ability to purchase items at exorbitant prices irrespective of the need for that item. When young children whose minds can be easily influenced, witness such things, there is an innate desire created to emulate the lifestyle of the celebrity. Children of course do not have the means to acquire these white goods and hence resort to all kinds of unethical methods to increase affordability. The resultant effect- increase in crime rates. The Daily Times recently reported that of all petty thefts committed during the time frame of a year, 52% were committed by children. Further analysis revealed that 60% of these kids were from well- established families and the reason for the theft was to own an item which they could not afford.
The behavioural aspects of celebrities also has an adverse impact on children. The recent broadcast of the death of celebrity Sushant Singh due to drug abuse has sparked a controversy. Many children on Facebook and twitter have commented that it is ok to consume drugs in reasonable amounts but an overdose in unacceptable. When an opinion poll was taken most of these kids said they were willing to try drugs as Sushant was their role model and they would like to emulate him. It is sad that children today would rather chose to emulate bad habits/behaviours rather than the good ones.
In conclusion, I believe news/television channels should censor some of the lifestyle aspects of celebrities so as to reduce the negative impact on children.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-01-17 apekshakd@gmail.com 56 view
2020-08-19 pameladsouza 78 view
2020-04-07 somu 11 view
2020-03-29 cpanavdeeppuri@gmail.com 89 view
2020-03-28 somu 84 view
Essays by user pameladsouza :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 536, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...people does have an impact on children. This essay will first look at the negative i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'choose'
Suggestion: choose
...is sad that children today would rather chose to emulate bad habits/behaviours rather...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 65, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... news/television channels should censor some of the lifestyle aspects of celebrities so as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...of the lifestyle aspects of celebrities so as to reduce the negative impact on children....
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reduce the negative impact on children.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, so, then, well, as to, in conclusion, of course

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9837398374 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74255278125 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6956565931 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7894736842 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4210526316 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31578947368 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183492553598 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056336140984 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516332821748 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115053599013 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293563440138 0.056905535591 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.