Modern communications mean that it’s no longer necessary to write letters.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is undeniable fact that the technological world has given enormous amounts of benefits to this generation. It is often argued that writing and posting letters are not required due to new innovations in the modern world. However, I partially agree with this kind of notion.
Apparently, many number of people are using different mediums to send messages to their loved ones rather than posting letters which holds wide range of constructive benefits. The most prominent benefit is that the message transfers from senders to receivers instantaneously by technological mediums such as mobile phones, internet, and many others. Moreover, the internet is one of the best key source to transfer the messages through WhatsApp, Facebook, and Instagram. For instance, if a person send a texts to his or her family, friend or relative, the message will be received in seconds to the receiver. Plus, the invention of telephone has decline the rate of sending letters through posts for communications. And, over the past few years, the invention of video call with the help of internet has covered the far distances for the families globally because people can virtually meet each other through their smartphones and can send the important and emergency messages quickly to their known ones. Therefore, with all above benefits, modern communications considered to be more hottest source of communications instead of using outdated communications method.
Despite the fact that the means of technological communications holds many benefits still, there is an importance of using old methods of communications because it has some good reasons. The first reason is that it holds the emotion and feelings of a sender as it is considered a special way of conveying the message because it takes time, effort, and a person's focus to write the letters in one go. Furthermore, posting letters is also carries a traditional way of invitation to their loved ones on certain occasions such as marriages, corporate events, and other parties. These reasons explain the cruciality of using the older methods of communications.
By way of conclusion, although modern communications has given numerous benefits to the society, older methods of communications has their own special kind of communication which is traditional and emotional.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-09 | mehjabin | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-09 | mehjabin | 61 | view |
| 2022-02-20 | lakhveer khokhar | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-05 | manu_kaur113 | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-24 | shain | 84 | view |
- You have seen an advertisement in an English newspaper for a job working in the City Museum shop during the holidays You decide to apply for the job Write a letter to the director of the Museum In your letter introduce yourself explain what experience and 84
- An increasing number of developing countries are expanding their tourist industry Why do you think it is the case Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- Nowadays most people are not as fit and active as they were in the past What are the main causes for this situation Suggest some possible solutions 73
- Modern communications mean that it s no longer necessary to write letters To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The historical building in your place is in bad condition Write to the local government In your letter Why the building is important what is the present condition what actions must be taken 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'many numbers'.
Suggestion: many numbers
...ith this kind of notion. Apparently, many number of people are using different mediums t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fits. The most prominent benefit is that the message transfers from senders to re...
^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a text' or simply 'texts'?
Suggestion: a text; texts
...stagram. For instance, if a person send a texts to his or her family, friend or relativ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1083, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'hottest' (without 'more') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: hottest
... modern communications considered to be more hottest source of communications instead of usi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1083, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'more the hottest'.
Suggestion: more the hottest
... modern communications considered to be more hottest source of communications instead of usi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'communications'' or 'communication's'?
Suggestion: communications'; communication's
...ommunications instead of using outdated communications method. Despite the fact that the me...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, for instance, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34426229508 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08464016167 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53825136612 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6731788231 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.4 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156175146525 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565122941008 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548157945199 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112314553776 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041560272351 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'many numbers'.
Suggestion: many numbers
...ith this kind of notion. Apparently, many number of people are using different mediums t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fits. The most prominent benefit is that the message transfers from senders to re...
^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a text' or simply 'texts'?
Suggestion: a text; texts
...stagram. For instance, if a person send a texts to his or her family, friend or relativ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1083, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'hottest' (without 'more') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: hottest
... modern communications considered to be more hottest source of communications instead of usi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1083, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'more the hottest'.
Suggestion: more the hottest
... modern communications considered to be more hottest source of communications instead of usi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'communications'' or 'communication's'?
Suggestion: communications'; communication's
...ommunications instead of using outdated communications method. Despite the fact that the me...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, for instance, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34426229508 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08464016167 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53825136612 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6731788231 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.4 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156175146525 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565122941008 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548157945199 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112314553776 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041560272351 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.