Money should be spent on creating new public buildings such as museums or town halls rather than renovating the existing ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The establishment of fresh public buildings by demolishing old buildings is not a rational decision. In my opinion, I am absolutely against this notion. Alternatively, public buildings should be refurbished into tourist spots and historical institutions for people.
To begin with, in contemporary era people are deep rooted in professional life that they might have been forgetting their rich culture and great history of their nation. The old monuments play a profound role to conserve informative archives for today's generation. As though, the Victoria memorial, Taj Mahal and Red fort are historical buildings with displays of quaint architecture and living examples of past substantial structures which disseminate the information from generation to generation.
In addition, these ancient buildings are beneficial for the tourist economy. Nowadays, the old buildings are renovated with slight modification without hampering real structure. For example, old forts which were not in use or empty for years as an abandoned erection are now revamped with modern facilities which attract numerous tourists. Rather than investing in new buildings, we have to preserve old constructions and modify the old establishment, this is helpful to society as well as the country's economy.
Although the refurbishment of existing buildings is an essential step. However, if any area has great history or individuals with specific contributions to society, then there will need to construct new public buildings for their achievement. Nevertheless, this initiative required a huge sum of capital which might not be possible where people are deficient from basic amenities.
Overall, it seems advisable that traditional monuments should require special care and time to time maintenance. Thus, I believe that preservation of existing buildings is foremost to save the culture and enlighten the young brains which are favourable to nation and society.
- SOME THINK THAT CLIMATE CHANGE REFORMS WILL NEGATIVELY AFFECT BUSINESS OTHERS FEEL THEY ARE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR BUSINESSES DISCUSS BOTH SIDES AND GIVE YOUR OWN OPINION 78
- these days many families move abroad for work some people believe that this benefits the children in their families other believe that it make their lives more difficult discuss both views and give your opinion 76
- Many people are involved in sports when they are young but stop once they are adults why do many adults stop doing physical exercise what can be done about this problem 92
- Computer games are very popular in all ages and nationalities Parents think it has little educational value and more harmful effects What is your opinion about it 61
- these days many families move abroad for work some people believe that this benefits the children in their families other believe that it make their lives more difficult discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ety as well as the countrys economy. Although the refurbishment of existing buildings...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, thus, well, for example, in addition, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68150684932 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16027983623 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630136986301 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0027776974 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.6 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13461498819 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484183026773 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413699881879 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793001849195 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429847166074 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.