More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern life style which cannot be treated with modern medicines. Some people think that a return to traditional medicines should be encouraged. To what extent do you agree?
Conventional medicine has received a great deal from media attention in recent decades since its effects on societies. Although some claim that there are no scientific evidences of traditional remedies on treating diseases, this kind of medicine definitely contributes to maintaining our health.
There is a fact that traditional medicine has its own demerits. First, it is totally inappropriate for many conditions. In fact, some serious illnesses, especially accidents, need be immediately treated, which makes this method ineffective as it needs a certain period be absorbed into our body. Second, traditional medicine is harmful for our health at some point. For instance, since it is not carefully regulated by neither governments nor authorized organizations, it is susceptible to increase the risk of poisoning due to using unknown natural materials, including various kinds of herbs.
However, long-established medicine definitely bestows many benefits for our societies. First, this medicine is more effective in compared with modern counterpart on treating some health problems. For examples, by using mostly natural-derived medicine, like herbs and leaves or root of trees, side effects are definitely reduced, which makes it suitable for large type of patients. Second, low-cost is also a great benefit of this method. Actually, since it is produced from materials found in nature or be planted in your garden and spread through generations without spending resources for experiments, which makes it become more popular, especially among low-income people, thanks to its better prices.
In conclusion, although many people tend to use traditional medicine instead of modern one, it also has some disadvantages. By using the advancements in medical sciences to integrate these two kinds of treatments, human can take all their advantages in foreseeable future.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-08-08 | Thaonguyen1409 | 84 | view |
2019-07-01 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
2019-07-01 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
2019-07-01 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
2019-07-01 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
- A government has a responsibility to its citizens to ensure their safety. Therefore, some people think that the government should increase spending on defense but spend less on social benefits. To what extent do you agree? 84
- The rise of convenience foods has helped people keep up with the speed of the modern life style. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend? 89
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines. Should parents be made by law to immunize their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children? Discuss both view and 84
- Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is a waste of valuable money Discuss both views and give your own opinion 96
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from death health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disag 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 596, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ials, including various kinds of herbs. However, long-established medicine defin...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70106761566 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12481860772 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629893238434 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9852103447 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.428571429 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204546496528 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717938009273 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734521234835 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119651014525 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165224940368 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.