Most artists earn low salaries and therefore should receive findings from the government in order for them to continue with their work.
To what extent do you agree?
Two days ago, I read an article about artists in Kazakhstan. In the article, the author highlighted that artists are in need of financial backup due to their low salary. This leads one to wonder whether governments should pay extra money to artists. This essay agrees with the idea of financial aid for the following reasons.
The first reason is that this aid will help artists to develop their skills in art. Artists need the government to supply them with financial aid so that they can refine their skills by taking courses. Once they improve their competency in artwork, they will be able to produce high-quality performances to entertain audience and, therefore, boost the public interest in art. For example, according to the top manager of the main theater in Karaganda city, while being provided with financial assistance by the state, the artists have started to take new plays to perform on stage, which in turn have attracted many visitors.
Another reason for financial support to artists is that artists can fully commit to art. Unless the government allocate extra pay for artists, they have to take part-time jobs, which reflects on culture. However, as soon as, the government supply them with extra funding, they can abandon their additional occupation and fully immerse in art. This results in cultural development. For instance, many artists stopped selling clothes in the local market, once the authorities agreed to raise their salary by twenty percent annually.
However, some economists claim that the government should not give artists with financial help. The main argument for this point of view is that there are more important occupations to support. As well as artists, teachers and medical staff have low salaries and need extra pay from the government, but if the authorities allocate aid to the artists, then they will have to decrease the wages in education and health care, which will negatively affect their work. Despite this, the work of artists is also significant as they enrich the public spiritually and culturally.
In conclusion, artists should certainly receive decent support from the government as this will allow them increase their qualifications and leave extra jobs.
- You would like to participate in (join, take part in) a work-related seminar(IT seminar) in another country (England).Write a letter to the person in charge of the seminar and ask for detailed information regarding the dates, program, accommodation and co 78
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result, people gravitate towards buying their products.What problems does it cause?What could be done to encourage people to buy local products? 61
- Some scientists think that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them. Other scientists think that it is a bad idea and would be dangerous.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like them very much. Why do people take part in dangerous sports? Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers. 78
- With a growing population, many people believe that we should focus on more genetically modified foods. What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing this? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19444444444 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58301073255 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530555555556 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8255424492 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.888888889 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248797198513 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857005544825 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493073435882 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163999438699 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264543354867 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.