Museums and art galleries should concentrate on local works rather than showing the cultures or artworks from other countries.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that local artwork collection places should display their own cultural creations instead of international artworks. In my opinion, I support the idea of raising the knowledge of national culture by local artworks.
At first, the government can spread the national culture by showing local artworks. Instead of display foreign works, which is a face of different cultures. People can easily to understand more about their own culture via artworks. For example , In VietNam the country is known as a war country in the past. There are many historical war museums, which are display the pictures of the war. People can easily get there to learn about the war and raise the proud of national. Second, in tourism, the visitors tend to learn about the country there are visiting. Therefore, displaying the local artworks is not only the way to advertise about the nation to the world, but also is the way to attract tourist from all over the world
Keeping artwork in the local museums is protecting the national culture. In some places, the local artwork is underrated and not protected. It lead to the disappear of local artworks, that in the future, become very precious. Each local artworks carry a history of national in each ages. Therefore, Protecting them is very important to every nation.
To conclude, The local artworks is a face of entire country throughout every era, therefore it should be displayed in the most formal position of art collection places.
- Many working people get little or no exercise either during the working day or in their free time and have health problems as a result Why do many working people not get enough exercise What can be done about this problem 61
- In many countries the level of crime is increasing and crimes are becoming more vio lent Why do you think this is and what can be done about it Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your experience 80
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on local works rather than showing the cultures or artworks from other countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 243, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ir own culture via artworks. For example , In VietNam the country is known as a wa...
^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...ork is underrated and not protected. It lead to the disappear of local artworks, tha...
^^^^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nderrated and not protected. It lead to the disappear of local artworks, that in the future, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99190283401 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6058964945 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522267206478 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 380.7 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.825159429 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4666666667 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193837727556 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646790175314 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506142936946 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128189360189 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159224745501 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.