New stories on TV and in Newspapers are often accompanied by pictures.
Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.
What is you opinion about this?
PICTURISATION HAS BECOME A RECENT TREND IN THE PROCESS OF PASSING INFORMATION. NOWADAYS, PRESS INDUSTRY AND NEWS CHANNELS HAVE STARTED ATTACHING IMAGES ALONG WITH THE STORYLINE. ITS IMPACT HAS THOUGHT TO BE GREATER IN COMPARISON TO THE LITERATURE. I AM A STRONG ADVOCATE OF SUCH UPGRADATION AND THIS ESSAY WILL HIGHLIGHT ITS EFFECTS.
FIRSTLY,IF A PHOTO IS STREAMED ALONG WITH THE HEADLINES, IT COMPELS THE LISTENER TO USE TWO OF ITS SENSORY ORGANS. IN OTHER WORDS, THE AUDIENCE IS ENCOURAGED TO USE ITS VISUAL AS WELL AS AUDIO SENSE ORGANS. FURTHERMORE THE SET OF INFORMATION IS GRASPED IN TWO WAYS LEADING TO A BETTER WAY OF UNDERSTANDING. IN ADDITION TO THIS, AT TIMES WHEN IT’S DIFFICULT FOR A VIEWER TO UNDERSTAND THE STANDARD, FORM OF TYPE OF LANGUAGE OF THE REPORTER, THE ACCOMPANYING PICTURE COULD ALLEVIATE THE SITUATION.
SECONDLY, THE AMOUNT OF RECEIVERS COULD ESCALATE BY PUBLISHING VIRTUAL ARTICLES. THIS IS BECAUSE, THE SET OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE UNABLE TO GRASP THE LITERATURE COULD LEARN ABOUT IT BY THE MEANS OF PHOTOGRAPHS. THESE GROUP OF PEOPLE MAY EITHER BE DISABLE ONE WHO CAN’T READ OR WHO AIN’T WELL EDUCATED TO HAVE THE SKILL. DON’T THEY DESERVE TO KNOW ABOUT THE SCENARIO IN THEIR SURROUNDING? THEREFORE, SUCH ADDITIONS COULD HELP TO MAKE THE UNDEVELOPED PEOPLE AWARE ABOUT THE INORDINANCE.
LASTLY, THE ADAPTATION OF A NEW TREND TO TRANSFER KNOWLEDGE COULD MOTIVATE THE YOUNGER ONES TO KNOW ABOUT THE HAPPENING. ALTHOUGH THE YOUNGER WON’T BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND LEGALITIES, IT WILL CREATE AN INTEREST AMONG THEM TO LEARN ABOUT IT.IN FACT, SUCH MOTIVATION WOULD PLAY A MAJOR ROLE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHILD. FOR INSTANCE, A RECENT SURVEY WAS LED BY INDIAN PUBLICATIONS, RESEARCHERS FOUND OUT THAT WITH THE INORDIANT FORM OF NEWS FLASHES, THERE IS ALARMING INCREASE IN YOUNGER READERS AND VIEWERS. ON FURTHER INVESTIGATION, IT WAS FOUND OUT THAT THESE NEW VIEWERS WERE KEEN ENOUGH TO LEARN ABOUT THE UNAWARE TOPICS AND SCENARIOS.
TO SUM UP, I BELIEVE THERE IS NO HARM IN THE PRAGMATIC SHIFT OF ATTACHING VISUAL IMAGES ALONGWITH THE NEWS STORIES. IN FACT, THE MORE IS MERRIER. IT ACTS AS A KEY ASSET IN ESCALATION OF CUSTOMERS OF THE PRESS COMPANIES. IN ADDITION TO THIS, IT ENHANCES THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INFORMATION.NEVERTHELESS; IT MAY AGGREVATE THE HARDWORK OF COMPANIES BUT WILL PROFIT THEM AND THE SOCIETY TO A GREATER EXTENT.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , IF
...AY WILL HIGHLIGHT ITS EFFECTS. FIRSTLY,IF A PHOTO IS STREAMED ALONG WITH THE HEAD...
^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: FURTHERMORE,
...S VISUAL AS WELL AS AUDIO SENSE ORGANS. FURTHERMORE THE SET OF INFORMATION IS GRASPED IN TW...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...END TO TRANSFER KNOWLEDGE COULD MOTIVATE THE YOUNGER ONES TO KNOW ABOUT THE HAPPE...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in fact, as well as, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10204081633 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10833540835 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563775510204 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2427338795 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2380952381 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123957685729 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0323106542121 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318382728821 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0590279144129 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240623621638 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 78.4519038076 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.