Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can government do to reduce the amount of rubbish produced? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
OVER THE YEARS, THE HEAP OF WASTE HAS ESCALATED TO A LARGER EXTENT. THERE HAS BEEN OBSERVED TREMENDOUS INCREASE IN PRODUCTION OF GARBAGE. MANY UPCOMING TRENDS AND FASHION ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUCH CONTAMINATION TO THE ENVIROMENT. HOWEVER; SOME PROPER ACTIONS CAN CONTROL THIS THREAT TO OCCUR IN NEAR FUTURE.
WESTERNISATION HAS NOT ONLY INFLUENCED THE CLOTHING PATTERN BUT ALSO CHANGED THE FOOD HABITS OF PEOPLE. PACKAGED FOODS, DRINKS, VEGETABLES AND FRUITS HAVE BECOME THE LATEST TREND AMONGST THE PEOPLE. FAVORITISM FOR SUCH PRODUCTS PUTS A DIRECT FORCE ON PUBLIC TO USE AND DUMP PACKING MATERIAL SUCH AS TISSUE PAPER, PLASTIC BAGS,PLASTIC BOTTLES ETC. AS A RESULT OF THIS, THERE IS A SEVERE BOOST IN THE GARBAGE DISPOSED COLLECTIVELY.
OTHER THAN THIS, IN THE HIGHLY COMPETITIVE RACE EVERYBODY WANTS TO ACHIEVE HIGHER REWARDS IN THE UNENDING RAT RACE. DUE TO THIS, MORE AND MORE FACTORIES HAVE BEEN SETUP. PRODUCTION UNITS ARE ONE OF THE MAJOR SOURCES OF WASTE PRODUCTION. THEREFORE, INCREASE IN NUMBER OF MANUFACTURERS ARE INEVITABILY A GREAT THREAT TO THE ECOSYSTEM. ACCORDING TO A SURVEY BY NATIONAL MUNICIPAL COOPERATION, 2/3RD OF THE GARBAGE OF A CITY IS PRODUCED FROM MANUFACTURING UNITS.
NEVERTHLESS, THE LOCAL COUNCIL CAN ADDRESS THIS TROUBLESOME SITUATION BY ENCORPORATION SIGNIFICANT RULES AND REGULATIONS. AUTHORITIES CAN PROHIBIT THE USE OF MATERIALS THAT CAN AGGREVATE THE DISPOSAL SYSTEM SUCH AS PLASTIC BOTTLES, PAPER PLATES, ETC. A NORM CAN BE ISSUED REGARDING THE WASTE MANAGEMENT FOR THE MANUFACTURERS.PRODUCTION COMPANIES SHOULD BE RESTRICTED TO PRODUCE LIMITED AMOUNT OF WASTE. IN ADDITION TO THIS, PENALTY MAY BE ALLOCATED IF THEY EXCEED THE SANCTIONED LIMIT. LASTLY, AWARENESS CAN PLAY A VITAL ROLE IN REDUCTION OF SUCH DISASTOROUS SITUATION. RECYCLING AND REUSING METHODS CAN BE PROMOTED TO PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT FROM SUCH HAZARDS.
TO SUM UP, STRICT RULES, REGULATION AND PREVENTIVE MEASURES CAN HELP TO DETORIATE THE QUANTITY OF WASTE PRODUCTION. THESE MEASURES WILL NOT ONLY REDUCE THE DUMP BUT ALSO PROTECT THE ECOSYSTEM FROM SOME DREADFUL SCENARIOS.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: HOWEVER,
...R SUCH CONTAMINATION TO THE ENVIROMENT. HOWEVER; SOME PROPER ACTIONS CAN CONTROL THIS T...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , PLASTIC
...ERIAL SUCH AS TISSUE PAPER, PLASTIC BAGS,PLASTIC BOTTLES ETC. AS A RESULT OF THIS, THERE...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, may, regarding, so, therefore, in addition, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44615384615 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11423530557 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624615384615 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.991713314 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.2857142857 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4761904762 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09523809524 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127130787303 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0333309641079 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347808683324 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0621732026373 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329148302436 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.99 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.