Nowadays people can buy a large variety of household goods, more than ever before in most countries in the world. Is this a good or bad development? Give your opinion and examples.
In this globalized eon, there is no doubt that the accessibility of consumer goods is higher than ever. The impact of this phenomenon is a highly debatable issue. However, this trend has more benefits than disadvantages. This essay will advocate my notion of belief.
On the one hand, today, society has become more materialistic than before hance, they tend to buy more of consumer good. Secondly, due to the high availability and competitive price, anyone can afford household items. However, this trend can have caused the pollution issue as these items are built for one-time use only. For instance, some of the electronic home appliances use the lithium battery which can not be recycled or reused and eventually increase the non-bio degradable waste and huge amount is needed for proper disposal of such electronic waste.
On the other hand, such an enormous purchase of these appliances would be boon for the economy as the currency is circulated in the market. This will create more employment in the production industry and eventually nation can have a stable economy. Moreover, the availability of these household items such as air-conditioning, the washing machine will improve the living standards of the citizen of the nation. For instance, the United State of America, the biggest market of consumer goods, has enabled strong economical and holistic growth of the nation.
In my opine, the benefits of this phenomenon curb the demerits and it is must be required for the overall development of the nation as it provides good employment and continuous money flow.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lt for one-time use only. For instance, some of the electronic home appliances use the lith...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17120622568 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80078891346 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579766536965 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5158753118 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.230769231 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189739262797 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709842333198 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526583094031 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11373766866 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448414827206 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.