Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.
Why do you think this is happening?
What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
People these days are generating a lot of waste leading to huge amount of garbage production. Due to easy availability of products in the market sector, public purchase poor quality goods at low prices to save money. Governments can force strict rules and policies such as avoiding sale of low grade things.
In order to save finances in this cost-risen world, people tend to lean towards cheap quality materials. These materials have low life expectancy therefore finding their way to waste-lands. Since new and upgraded products are available easily, humans have started ignoring the value of goods. For example, China offers a wide variety of products in different costs so that all people can afford it and this can widely be seen in India where people use and throw these products thereby producing more rubbish. Hence, such is the market industry that focuses on quantity and not quality.
To stop such practices governments should take necessary actions by enforcing serious laws on manufacturing organizations as well as people. Because of these rules the industry will produce good quality materials with high life span rather than poor ones as this will set a bar. Also, imposing such regulations on people will force them to keep their environment clean. A study suggests that Singapore produces very less garbage because the government forces public to pay huge penalty in case of littering. In fact, many first world companies produce more and more high quality products leaning towards eco-friendly system to avoid waste generation. To sum up, garbage can be reduced by serious involvement of governments.
Thus, waste produced by people should be taken into account. Governments, market industry or people - everyone lives in this society and should aim to make this world a better place to live in.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in fact, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17966101695 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.623710508 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623728813559 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0126667507 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129823281012 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383756641744 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398139249416 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0751955869877 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030843421394 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.