People think that countries should produce the food their population eats and import less food as much as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people argue that it is necessary for governments to encourage the development of staple foods production and reduce buying food from other countries. This essay will clarify why this idea is true.
On the one hand, countries should intensively produce staple foods to feed their citizens and provide for exporting activities. First, a significant amount of traditional foods, such as rice or wheat, will ensure that all citizens can access them all year around without finding alternatives. For example, assuming that this year, the weather conditions in Vietnam are hash and inconvenient to farming, Vietnamese people still have enough rice to cook and do not need to eat potatoes or yam alternatively. Second, mass produce of staple foods will bring more international monetary for a country as the country use the excessive amount of the food production for exporting. This fact is so true to Vietnam as this country often grows a higher amount of rice than needed to sell to other countries after feeding well its population.
On the other hand, limiting buying foods from international sources is a good idea to support the national agriculture and avoid the disease outbreak. If the government of countries accept a very small amount of foods imported from foreign places, local people will focus on shopping from local sources because they have not many choices. As a result, local farmers are motivated to find effective cultivating methods in order to produce foods with the best quality. Moreover, less transporting foods over the borders also contributes to reduce the virus transmission. This lesson can be learnt from the fact that experts in an isolated area like North Pole got infected Coronavirus, which was transferred through the food delivery from external places.
In conclusion, I completely agree with the idea of that the governments of countries should focus more on producing traditional foods and reduce the imported amount.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 89 | view |
| 2021-01-06 | Hanachan123456789 | 84 | view |
- More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes cars and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 67
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animal as food or to use animal products for example clothing and medicines To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In some countries advertisers increase the amount of advertising which tries to persuade children to buy snacks toys and other goods Parents object to such pressure on children But some advertisers claim that there is useful information in these advertise 83
- Smoking is a major cause of serious illness and death throughout the world today What are impacts of this What can the government do to solve the problem 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'foods'' or 'food's'?
Suggestion: foods'; food's
... to encourage the development of staple foods production and reduce buying food from ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 754, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the food delivery from external places. In conclusion, I completely agree with t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23174603175 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79090774423 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574603174603 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5946916983 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.769230769 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261427955483 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989910174494 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707076552517 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171677529537 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440071716544 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.