A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Society has always been status conscious. People of late who are rich are gaining popularity. It is thought by some people that old fashion values like esteem, generosity and loyalty are given less importance than the material things. I completely disagree with the notion that a person is judged by his wealth and shall further validate my claim through plausibe examples
It cannot be denied that rich people are respected more compared to others. But, in my opinion, people are adored due to their beneficial works towards a society not just because they have more money. In other words, a rich person is admired and respected due to his generosity, in contrast to a person who is rich and selfish is not considered as a respected member of society. For example, Azeem premji of WIPRO group of companies. He himself travels by economy Class and takes meals with his staff in their canteen as well as of late has donated more than fifty percent of his shares to philanthropic causes. Hence, he is held in high esteem by all citizens of the world due to his noble deeds and Such people are truly worthy of being idolized.
On the other hand, there are many people who may have made a fortune, yet when it comes to garnering true deference. They seem to struggle till date, to make a place in people’s heart. For instance, ,Vijay Mallaya the pioneer of kingfisher liquor tycoon and even the owner of kingfisher Airlines of India, who is still considered to be rich and powerful. Despite being so rich has never contributed to Social causes. And right now, he is the most hated person due to his hedonist lifestyle which has had a detrimental effect on the entire nation. Due to his lavishness he is currently owing the national banks up to 7000 crores of rupees. So he may have initially taken the world by a storm by his prodigal lifestyle, but of late simple the same person is being considered an anathema by millions
To sum up, I strongly believe that a rich person is not respected by any if he is not useful to the society irrespective of this financial status. Generosity, kindness is the key to be admired and gain respect in this world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er of society. For example, Azeem premji of WIPRO group of companies. He himself...
^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f society. For example, Azeem premji of WIPRO group of companies. He himself tra...
^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to till'
Suggestion: to till
...g true deference. They seem to struggle till date, to make a place in people's ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ce in people's heart. For instance, ,Vijay Mallaya the pioneer of kingfisher ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to, in my opinion, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66753926702 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54255333302 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549738219895 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.5478044229 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.882352941 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4705882353 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.70588235294 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121246782505 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391478834452 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324686291147 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839783065564 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245332119804 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.