For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Social development and Intelligence of every school children are important, and it is believed that teachers are more influential than parents in these aspects. I completely agree with this notion. Teachers often develop activities and tasks that increase the knowledge and relationship of these children.
One obvious way teachers influence school children more is through teamwork. For instance, teachers usually divide students into groups where they perform uniform tasks, such as singing and reading, and it has been working. Doing this would not only facilitate the children's communication skills but also encourage them to share ideas and, consequently, their knowledge banks have been vastly improving.
Another great impact of teachers in developing these youngsters is by consistently challenging them in competitions, which ensures they are actively engaged. These facilitator occasionally set up quizzes and debates where several brainstorming questions are asked and, at the end, the winner is rewarded with prizes. Consequently, such activities tend to motivate the majority of school children to learn continually as there seems to be reward for being intelligent.
However, parents may not have necessary requirements and environment to set up these competitions, but they also play an important role in intelligence and social growth of school young adults. Even though some parents do not have accurate understanding of assignment given to their children, they still assist and monitor them to ensure that they remember the acquired knowledge. Thus, they contribute to the maintenance of children's competency level.
In conclusion, although parents are somewhat positively effective in keeping the knowledge pace of schoolchildren, teachers are architects of the majority of activities that determine their social performance and Intelligence growth. I, therefore, argue that teachers have more influence on them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-28 | b.yousefi | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | adeagboridwan | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | adeagboridwan | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-13 | kaur_deep | 61 | view |
| 2019-02-07 | VishvAdthakkar | 61 | view |
- Shopping is now common in many countriesWhy is this the caseIs a positive of negative development 78
- The behaviour of students in class is becoming worse and worse.What has led to the situation?What can be done to solve it? 11
- Today, most people get married and give birth in their thirties rather than when they are youngerIs it a positive or negative development?To what extent do you support this development? 78
- Should private schools receive government funding? 78
- Write a letter to your friend who lives in another country and in your letter:- invite him/her to the public event in your country- Describe the public event- Explain about other plans you have for your friend when he/she will visit 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this facilitator' or 'These facilitators'?
Suggestion: This facilitator; These facilitators
...hich ensures they are actively engaged. These facilitator occasionally set up quizzes and debates...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87323943662 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08524655101 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609154929577 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3810547434 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.142857143 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32599995354 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108196434788 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688008359528 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182965469209 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641757262607 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.