For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Social development and Intelligence of every school children are important, and it is believed that teachers are more influential than parents in these aspects. I somewhat agree with this notion. While teachers often develop activities and tasks that increase the knowledge and relationship of these children, parents also play their roles
One obvious way teachers influence school children more is through teamwork. For instance, teachers usually divide students into groups where they perform uniform tasks, such as singing and reading, and it has been working. Doing this would not only facilitate the children's communication skills but also encourage them to share ideas and, consequently, their knowledge banks are vastly improving.
Another great impact of teachers in developing these youngsters is by consistently challenging them in competitions, which ensures they are actively engaged. These facilitator occasionally set up quizzes and debates where several brainstorming questions are asked and, at the end, the winner is rewarded with prizes. Consequently, such activities tend to motivate the majority of school children to learn continually as there seems to be reward for being intelligent.
However, parents may not have necessary requirements and environment to set up these competitions, but they also play an important role in intelligence and social growth of school young adults. Even though some parents do not have accurate understanding of assignment given to their children, they still assist and monitor them in order to ensure that they remember the acquired knowledge. Thus, they contribute to the maintenance of children's competency level.
In conclusion, teachers are architects of the majority of activities that determine their social performance and Intelligence growth. Parents could be considered to have more influence on schoolchildren if they are able to create more similar activities like the teachers, which is unlikely to happen. Therefore, I am somehow convinced that teachers are more influential
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-28 | b.yousefi | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | adeagboridwan | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | adeagboridwan | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-13 | kaur_deep | 61 | view |
| 2019-02-07 | VishvAdthakkar | 61 | view |
- Nowadays in many countries young people leave rural areas to study or work in cities. What are the reasons for this? Do the benefits of this outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Some people think that all University students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should be only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology Discuss both views and 78
- These days, mobile phones and the internet are very important to the ways people relate to one another socially. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Time off work 87
- Your daughter wants to study English at a language school in the town of Weymouth next year.Write a letter to the school. In your letterAsk for information about the courseExplain that your daughter is interested in social eventsFind out what accommodatio 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 159, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this facilitator' or 'These facilitators'?
Suggestion: This facilitator; These facilitators
...hich ensures they are actively engaged. These facilitator occasionally set up quizzes and debates...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75737704918 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05135476848 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586885245902 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3433818242 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.428571429 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329763951094 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108532306226 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079041961026 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189738685012 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075283462049 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.