School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is true that children are the future of our society so social and intellectual development of children is of paramount importance. There is a raging debate where some people believe that school teachers are more responsible for the social and intellectual development of students than parents. In my opinion, I disagree with this statement as I believe that guardians are more responsible. I will elucidate in the below paragraphs and present arguments to support my opinion.

Since children have more attachment with guardians so it is easier for parents to understand the weakness of their children from an adolescent age and play a pivotal role in the overall grooming. The method of teaching is also self-styled and based on the capability of each individual which makes it easier for children to understand. In a recent study published by Scientific facts magazine, it was mentioned that children from a juvenile age tend to imitate and learn the habits from parents.

Similarly, on the other hand,<span class="hiddenSuggestion" pre="Similarly "></span> it can be noticed that teachers play a supporting role due to the fact that they spend lesser time and have less bonding with children. In schools, students need to adhere to the rules and regulations which enables them to learn basic attequetes which contribute to the overall development at a juvenile age. To elucidate in a recent survey done by Economic times around majority of people said it was the parents who inculcated moral and ethical values in their children but the teacher played a supporting role in grooming such values.

To conclude as per the arguments and examples mentioned above parents play a pivotal role in the social and intellectual development of children which can help them in becoming better citizens of tomorrow.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-01-22 vinshu koul 73 view
2018-08-01 venky1100 84 view
2018-07-14 Ajay.dhariwal 73 view
2018-07-01 Mafijur 73 view
2018-07-01 Mafijur 61 view
Essays by user vinshu koul :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 480, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...resent arguments to support my opinion. Since children have more attachment with...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'facts'' or 'fact's'?
Suggestion: facts'; fact's
... a recent study published by Scientific facts magazine, it was mentioned that childre...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tate and learn the habits from parents. Similarly, on the other hand, ^^^^^
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , ...rents. Similarly, on the other hand, ^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27986348123 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44589239857 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529010238908 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.8516992798 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.636363636 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202607546055 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882857386045 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128193791217 0.0667982634062 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132686651884 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11867374964 0.056905535591 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.