Some believe that modern technology has made people less socially active, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Having been introduced new technologies as blessings to the masses, together with the ever-increasing use of them in recent years have arisen the notion that whether people are seriously prone to less sociability or not. I will, however, discuss both views deeming sides of the debate.
Opponents of cutting-edge technologies often assert that gone are the days when making just a phone call to have a brief conversation was the only state-of-the-art technological way of communication, so people often had to go outdoors to deal with their daily affairs. Subsequently, through many face-to-face daily conversations, they were much more likely to build up stronger bonds and be more socially active. Yet, with the advent of new technological gadgets, however, the people’s sociability is deteriorating because the need for physical presence in many activities is declining. Robots, for example, do many tasks which human is unable to do and meet many human requirements even as a life companion.
On the other hand, proponents of the contemporary technology cite the fact that this not only has not restricted people but also has provided ample opportunity and enabled them to communicate with people globally. People, for example, with the click of a button on their smartphones, are instantly capable of having a video chat with others through communication software or social media if they want. This provides human with additional communication approaches along with the traditional ones which considerably enhances the chances of getting involved with various activities in groups or societies worldwide. Thus, the technology could be regarded as a boon to engage human being in diverse social activities.
On balance, modern technology seems to be inevitably intertwined with human life and has its own downsides. Despite this, I believe that this added more options in communication approaches to enable people being more socially active.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45544554455 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18527160374 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607260726073 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.9257187171 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.75 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176423322229 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691432097688 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421599846534 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11608319295 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339721972078 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.