Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times, even on holidays. Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages?
It is considered by some employers that the workers of a company should be constantly approachable during weekends and vacations. In my opinion, this tendency to demand employees to be accessible on first call above the working hours has more negative consequences than positive ones.
First, if workers will be in constant touch with managers, it may be beneficial for a business in terms of urgent issues that cannot be solved without a particular worker. For instance, if any project has a deadline and extra time is demanded for its completion, employer will be able to call worker for overtime work. As a result, a project will be completed in time, customers will be satisfied and a company will not pay for the forfeit. Thus, all mentioned arguments might encourage managers to insist on that the workers should be constantly in touch.
However, it is also possible to make an opposite case. It is known that after some productive period of time, production is going down significantly and there no a point to continue a task. A person without sufficient rest feels lack of motivation and overall tiredness. Thus, being hardwired to a mobile phone during a vacation may increase level of stress and completely spoil the purpose of it. Consequently, many business owners have realized that in fact a working week should be shorten to 4 working days because this measure will help to increase productivity.
In conclusion, having considered the argument from both sides, I think that employers should not force employees to be always in touch. It is not necessary and in fact, in a long term, it could be harmful for a business because people get tired and lost their motivation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | Mariamirabella | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-01 | l1136667 | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-06 | insidematrix | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-21 | Singh Brar | 61 | view |
| 2018-06-21 | Singh Brar | 61 | view |
- Writing task 1 (a letter)You work for an international company. Recently your job has changed and you believe that more training is needed. Write a letter to your manager and say- How has your job changed?- Describe a type of training you will need.- Sugg 78
- Nowadays young people know less about traditions and culture than in the past What are the reasons for it Is this a positive or negative development 65
- Many large supermarkets are being built today while the number of small shops is decreasing Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 77
- It is sometimes thought that people who travel outside of their own country are more tolerant and understanding of others To what extent do you agree 92
- People doing dangerous sports like bungee jumping and scuba diving should be responsible for their own life and rescue workers should not risk their live people.Do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 95, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... It is known that after some productive period of time, production is going down significantly...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 160, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...n is going down significantly and there no a point to continue a task. A person wi...
^^
Line 9, column 486, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'shortened'?
Suggestion: shortened
...d that in fact a working week should be shorten to 4 working days because this measure ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, thus, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97543859649 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8205070608 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59298245614 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2127647989 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.076923077 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163386185565 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578532456168 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345950092334 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106987770283 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315198970335 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.