Nowadays, some people argue that technological Inventions, such as mobile phones are making a lot of people socially less interactive. This is a known truth in the world today and I agree that mobile phones make people socially less interactive.
First, let’s take a look at social media apps, such as Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. These social media platforms tend to engage its audience because of the eye candy contents been displayed on their timelines. On the other hand, this is the main reason why a lot of people in the same spot are on their mobile phones and not socializing or talking to each other.
Furthermore, this technological invention has made it possible to download games to your mobile phones. After these games have been downloaded by the user of the mobile phone, it tends to distract them during a social gathering. At weddings, you will notice that the wedding guests are all on their mobile phones and no attention is paid to the ongoing event. In schools, kids don’t engage in conversations during their break time any longer like the old days because of the invention of mobile phones which make it possible to download games on to the device.
In addition, I want to discuss about picture taking with mobile phones. Technological invention has made it possible for cameras to be made available on phones. By this development, a lot of people focus more on taking pictures while hanging out in a social environment. Between the beginning and end of birthday parties, most guest are less socially interactive due to the fact that they’re engaged with taking pictures. The stories on social media platforms have taken pictures and video uploads to a whole new level because of the real time unlimited posts one can make.
To conclude, I agree that technological inventions, such as mobile phones are making people socially less interactive whenever they are engaged with it.
- More and more people give money as a gift rather than buy some items What is the reason for this Is it a negative or positive trend 56
- Do you have to plan for the future Or stay focused on our present What is your opinion and why Provide examples to support your stand 56
- Do you have to plan for the future Or stay focused on our present What is your opinion and why Provide examples to support your stand 56
- Some people believe that entertainers are paid too much and their impact on the society is negative while others disagree and believe that they deserve the money they make because of their positive effect on others Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people say that government should give priority to health care whereas others say they should spend on other important priorities Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, look, so, while, as to, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00934579439 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68251253254 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517133956386 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0683991216 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.2 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453052320338 0.244688304435 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16063301436 0.084324248473 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156648350867 0.0667982634062 235% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301149305787 0.151304729494 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.17368047542 0.056905535591 305% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.