Some people believe that it is wrong to keep animals in zoos, while others think that zoos are both entertaining and ecologically important. Discuss both views.
It is argued that the restrainment of animals in zoos is not correct, while some believe they are not only entertaining but also have ecological importance. Even though there are few negative facts about maintaining a zoo, there are also good reasons why it might be beneficial to keep them open.
On the one hand, having zoos are important due to several benefits. Firstly, they play an important role in wildlife conservation. There are lots of endangered species protected in zoos, which has become the most prominent solution to preserver them for the future. Secondly, they are important in an educational perspective where scientists, as well as students, can conduct researches on animals conveniently. For instance, the Natural Biography magazine stated in one of their articles that most of their scientific studies are done with the help of zoos with minimal cost. Finally, the zoo is a place of entertainment for a family and they make a great day out with children.
On the other hand, the idea of zoos is wrong morally as well as in the environmental perspective. Entrapment of wildlife in a confined space is unethical. Animals are living creatures and they deserve their freedom more or less as humans. Numerous wildlife protection groups state that animals in zoos spend their lives depressed. Moreover, the animals in the zoos are not living in their natural habitats but in artificial environments, which cause them to lose their natural instincts. They wouldn't be able to survive without people feeding them, even if they were released, after a long time caged for entertainment.
In conclusion, entrapment of wildlife in zoos have benefits in environmental, educational and entertainment perspectives. Nevertheless, it cannot be denied that there is an ethically and environmental downside to this.
- Some people think the main purpose of schools is to turn children into good citizens and workers rather than to benefit them as individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 84
- People generally know that the environment is important However most individuals still don t take responsibility to protect the environment Why is this what should be done to encourage people to protect the environment Give reasons for your answer or incl 84
- The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from suburbs or the countryside to live in the cities To what extent do you agree or disagree 86
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...they deserve their freedom more or less as humans. Numerous wildlife protection gr...
^^
Line 5, column 494, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...m to lose their natural instincts. They wouldnt be able to survive without people feedi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, more or less, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23890784983 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06054868674 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566552901024 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3147198735 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9375 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3125 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6875 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243095035861 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798116394964 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723743875198 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147956768518 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594853692239 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.