Some people prefer to live in a house, while others feel that there are more prons to living in an apartment. Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house compared with living in an apartment?
BIG BUNGALOWS ACTS AS MAGNETS TO A GROUP OF PEDESTRIANS WHILE THE LATTER PREFER TO STAY IN FLAT SCHEMES. I AM A STRONG ADVOCATE OF THESE COMPARTMENT BUILDINGS AND THIS ESSAY WILL ELABORATE ITS MERITS AND DEMERITS.
ON ONE HAND, SECURITY IS THE UTMOST BENEFICIAL SERVICE THAT IS EXUDED IN APARTMENTS. SECURITY GUARDS ARE HIRED IN CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT AND CCTV CAMERAS ARE INSTALLED ON ALMOST EVERY REACHABLE VIEW POINT FROM THE BUILDING. AS A RESULT OF THIS AN EYE IS KEPT ON EVERY MOVEMENT THAT OCCURS INSIDE THE CAMPUS TO AVOID AND KIND OF UNCERTAINTIES. MOREOVER, THE AVAILABILITY OF WIDE VARIETY OF FACILITIES SUCH AS GROCERY SHOP, LAUNDRY STORES, PLAYING ZONE INSIDE OR IN VICINITY TO THE PROPERTY ACTS AS A MAJOR BENEFICT FOR THE RESIDENTS. A RECENT SURVEY CONDUCTED BY ONE OF THE LEADING BUILDERS ASSOCIATION STATES THAT ABOUT 75% OF THEIR CUSTOMERS HAVE A GREATER INCLINATION TOWARDS BUYING ACCOMODATION WHICH HAS MAJORITY IN-CAMPUS SERVICES. IN ADDITION TO THIS, WITH THE ALARMING INCREASE IN DEMAND FOR APARTMENTS THE HOUSING COMPANIES HAVE DETERRED THEIR PRICES TO A GREATER EXTENT. THEREFORE, IN COMPARISON TO BUYING A LAND AND CONSTRUCTING A HOUSE ON IT THIS SCHEME PROVES TO BE COST-EFFECTIVE AND QUITE REASONABLE.
ON THE OTHER HAND, INDEPENDENT PREMISES HAVE THIS MAJOR AGENDA TO PROVIDE FREEDOM TO THE HOUSEMATES. THE MEMBERS EXPERIENCE THE LENIENCY TO LIVE ON THEIR TERMS WITHOUT BEING CONCERNED ABOUT THE PEOPLE IN THEIR VICINITY. THEY AIN’T RESTRICTED TO A CERTAIN LIMIT FOR THEIR LIFESTYLE. SPACIOUS ENVIROMENT ADDS ON TO THE FAVOURTISM FOR SUCH KIND OF ACCOMODATION. NEVERTHLESS, WITH THE ESCALATION IN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS THESE MERE DRAWBACKS OF LIVING IN MUILTSTORED BUILDING HAVE BEEN ENORMURSLY SUBSIDED BY INTRODUCING INVARIABLE DIFFERENT INFRASTRUCTURES. ARCHITECTS HAVE COME UP WITH UPGRADATIONS IN FLAT SCHEMES THAT PROVIDES THEIR BUYERS NOT ONLY MORE THAN SUFFICIENT LAND BUT ALSO ADEQUATE PRIVACY FOR THEIR FAMILY.
TO SUM UP MODERNISATION HAS HELPED PEOPLE TO IMPROVE THEIR LIFESTYLE. ONE OF THE IMPROVISING FACTOR IS THE FLAT SCHEMES. THEIR ADVANTAGES HAVE OVER-RULED THE OPTION OF BUNGALOWS LEADING TO INCREASE IN FAVOURITISM FOR APARTMENTS DAY BY DAY.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in addition, kind of, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37861271676 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09535818176 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604046242775 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9590157047 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.388888889 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126292090751 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318877628157 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370533418361 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0638606519578 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407545496091 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.