It is commonly believed that the personality and background of an individual can be judged by outer appearance. It is my opinion that i completely agree with the view as the way of styling says a lot about our persona
To begin with, carrying a particular style portrays basic information, such as religion, profession and nature. In other words, if an individual is wearing Burkha, it is easy to identify that the person belongs to muslim community. Similarly, someone wearing a robe depicts buddhist culture. In addition, the occupation can also be recognised by the articles of dressing. To further corroborate, wearing a black coat simply means the person is a Lawyer by profession or a white coat is a symbol of a medical practitioner. These dresses are universally accepted, so everyone can easily understand the job of such people.
Furthermore, dressing sense gives an opportunity to have a basic idea of one' nature. A number of individuals are fashion sensitive and often called fashion freaks as they never miss any updated vogue. Not only this but also if an individual is wearing loose-fit clothes rather than normal fit, they seem to be careless by nature. On the contrary, if someone prioritises comfort and wears casual attires, they tend to be classic by nature. It thoroughly depends on observation skills. Thus, the more the people observe, the better they can understand the personality.
In conclusion, it is irrefutable that the way individuals carry themselves demonstrate few traits about the background, nature, mentality and occupation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wears'.
Suggestion: wears
...to muslim community. Similarly, someone wearing a robe depicts buddhist culture. In add...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, similarly, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19291338583 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03404382151 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61811023622 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6341819364 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2142857143 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0755029787312 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0215634310475 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026815161197 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0558285426145 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477730117567 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.