Some people say that technologies like mobile phones are disrupting social interaction. Do you agree or disagree?
Due to contribution of the technology, like electronic devices, mobile phones have become part of the daily life. That is why some opine that the cell phone has had an adverse effect on the social interaction. However, I disagree with this notion. A number of arguments surround my opinion.
To begin with, mobile phones have not destroyed social interaction; they have merely changed it. Now people don’t meet each other face to face, they are connected to each other through this marvel of technology. Various options of the mobile sets allow to be connected with all around him, even with a long lost friends and neighbours. Inside a hand set we can have contact numbers and can get informed if someone calls even when the set is switched off. So nobody is beyond reach over very long distant, internet browsing, email checking options through cell phone also have made our life easier and one can get latest news of any member over a second of the time within his social circle. Earlier when a person is away from home, he was cut off from his family till he returned. But, today he is connected with them all time.
Furthermore, it would not be wrong to say that social interaction has greatly enhanced because of this technology godsend. Earlier people had friends only in their propinquity, but now it is possible to have a large number of friends from the whole world. It goes without saying that today’s youngsters have the largest social network that ever in the history of the mankind.
Undoubtedly, face to face interactions have come down but that is because of the fast paced lifestyle. Over the last half century, our lifestyles have changed beyond our wildest expectations. To survive in this. 24/7 society and to keep up with the Jones’ people have become workaholics. This is the main reason of the loss of the social interaction. The mobile phones only help the people stay interconnected in today’s time.
To sum up, cell phones have not lessened social interaction, they have merely changed the way of interaction and they have in many ways increased the social network of the people.
- Some people say that technologies like mobile phones are disrupting social interaction Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think public library is necessary however other believe that the public library is useless What is your opinion and provide with some relevant examples 73
- Discipline is an ever increasing problem in modern schools Some people think that discipline should be the responsibilities of teachers while other thinks this is role of parents Discuss both sides and give your opinion 56
- Some people think that the government should increase tax on unhealthy food to encourage people to start eating healthy Do you agree or disagree 61
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by 20 in the last ten years Discuss the caused and effects of this disturbing trend 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 609, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'get the latest'.
Suggestion: get the latest
...o have made our life easier and one can get latest news of any member over a second of the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...inquity, but now it is possible to have a large number of friends from the whole world. It goes w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, second, so, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8347107438 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54830019941 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556473829201 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4638900816 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5714285714 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2857142857 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47619047619 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199121120027 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595271656193 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552053372169 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127552538624 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417356619153 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.