Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Choosing a useful stream of study is always a vital issue among people. Some argue that children should be studying subjects at the University that can be proved beneficial for them in the future, while others believe that students should have the freedom to select subjects of their choice, and I entirely agree with the latter assertion.
People, who hold the view that students should only be studying science and technology at the University, assume that having expertise in these fields will provide youth with the more career opportunities as more and more countries are developing and seeking individuals with more knowledge in this sector. Also, it will benefit them financially as it is often seen that professionals working in science and information technology earn a massive amount of salaries which help them in leading a luxurious lifestyle.
Nevertheless, the opponents advocate studying a subject of the choice of a student at the University and, I also agree with this. They argue that every youngster mostly study each subject until their secondary school education, so they are fully aware of their capabilities, interest and strengths in any particular subject and they would like to explore more in that chosen area. The University study can be used to go in depth in that selected subject. Additionally, pressurising youngster to only focus on science and technology even if they are not good at it, can bring out adverse consequences not only for the future career of the student and can affect them mentally as well.
Furthermore, It is wrong to assume that only learning science or technology can enable them to lead a wealthy lifestyle. There are other are that can fulfil this demand too. For example, an artist working in the film industry usually receive ten times more money than an average person. On the top of that, often the job market is unpredictable, and it is hard to assume that what skills can be needed for the growth of a country. So, without a doubt, students should be allowed to pursue a study in their field of interest at the Universities.
To conclude, although it seems very beneficial to study science and technology at the University, I strongly suggest students excel in the areas of their choices through tertiary education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | hueminh | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | D_g_b | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | Farhad1010 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Farhad1010 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Farhad1010 | 61 | view |
- You recently visited a store and did not like the customer service there. Write a letter to the store manager and say:1) What was the issue there?2) Why wasn't the staff helpful?3)Suggest what can be done about it? 87
- Some experts believe that is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 73
- You are organising a trip to the Snowy Mountains in New South Wales for a group of students from Perth in Western Australia.Write to the manager of Student Hostel Services. In your letter, explain:when you want to visit the Snowy Mountainshow long you wil 61
- You recently visited a store and did not like the customer service there. Write a letter to the store manager and say:1) What was the issue there?2) Why wasn't the staff helpful?3)Suggest what can be done about it? 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 685, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t and can affect them mentally as well. Furthermore, It is wrong to assume that ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'others'?
Suggestion: others
... to lead a wealthy lifestyle. There are other are that can fulfil this demand too. Fo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, nevertheless, second, so, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03157894737 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75294352665 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528947368421 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.0099383992 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.571428571 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334409685876 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113531969314 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846909796851 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185423676311 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863989959054 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.