SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT FOREign visitors should be charged more than locals when they visit cultural and tourist attractions in a country . to what extent do you agree with this view.
Everyone want to roam in another country to see various historical and traditions of particular place and enhance their knowledge and appease their inquisitively about culture. Quite a few suggest that foreign tourist should be charge more than locals. It is seemingly right and I am agree with this view.
First of all, our historical places are our pride and illustrate our rich past. Government spend a huge amount over there maintenance and safety, they hire staff for this who are handle all the matter regarding places. They have paid by government for their services. If tourist attraction places will not generate money than all the burden will come upon government and local citizens. If they take higher charges from them it will definitely become an extra source of foreign currency, which can boost our economy growth. Moreover, foreign bucks brings prosperity and thrive local business as well as whole country economy.
Secondly, government always privilege tourist with enticing schemes they run special buses for them with luxurious facilities and provide tourist guide who can explain various aspects of our history and traditions. For instance, in Jaipur every one have to buy ticket to see the Uday palace, and they charge more from foreigner compare to local. But they also provide them unique service.
To conclude, I consider that if tourist pay more than locals than it is optimum thing for our country and it is definitely not unfair deed. because mostly country charge higher price from visitor as it is the source of income.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'charged'?
Suggestion: charged
... suggest that foreign tourist should be charge more than locals. It is seemingly right...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
... locals. It is seemingly right and I am agree with this view. First of all, our his...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 92, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
...nd illustrate our rich past. Government spend a huge amount over there maintenance an...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 92, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
...nd illustrate our rich past. Government spend a huge amount over there maintenance an...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 172, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ce and safety, they hire staff for this who are handle all the matter regarding places....
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, well, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 41.998997996 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 1615.20841683 67% => OK
No of words: 209.0 315.596192385 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1961722488 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51292303319 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.665071770335 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 506.74238477 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.189799386 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7272727273 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256416299347 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10031004515 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764797180122 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158000426709 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512070013344 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.