Some people think that giving their children a certain amount of money every week will help them have fewer financial problems in the future. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays there is a contentious argument over whether children who are paid weekly, have less financial difficulties in the future. I totally agree with this matter because they know how to manage their financial issues and also, they learn how much it is important to have a plan for their budget and some saving money as well.
First of all, it is noteworthy to say that childhood is the best period that children can learn some critical skills. Managing the financial issue is one of those skills which plays a vital role in their future. When children are given a certain amount of money for a specific duration of time, for example, a week, they will learn how to control their costs. To illustrate, they are forced to avoid spending their money without thinking, which helps them to become more thoughtful in upcoming years.
Another reason to agree is that this method of payment results in being more independent which bring a new set of positive concerns. When children have their own money, they become aware of the importance of saving money. Besides, they will learn how to afford their costs without the support of their parents. The main positive consequence of this situation is that when they become adults, they are able to solve their problems by themselves. Also, they are able to make an investment in different projects and make a huge amount of profit.
On the other hand, they will learn how to overcome the limitations. In fact, they will learn to be creative-thinker and try to think out of the box. They have to find some alternative solutions to increase their money such as finding a part-time job which leads to more experiences and skills.
In conclusion, I tend to believe that those children who are paid weekly money are more successful in managing their financial issues in adultness. Because they know how to control their costs based on their budget and also, they become aware of the necessity of saving money. Given this situation, it seems these children will become smart-shopper and become familiar with economic knowledge which can help them to make money or increase their capabilities in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-28 | yaldaasgari | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | yaldaasgari | 73 | view |
- Some educationalists argue that non-exam art-based subjects, such as music, drama, art and craft, should be compulsory in the secondary-school curriculum. They believe that activities such as these can improve overall academic performance. To what extent 78
- You have stayed at a friend s house last weekend and forgot your watch there Write a letter To him her and say Thank him her for the weekend stay Describe your watch and where you could have left it Suggest a way how to get it back 73
- You recently met a couple who will be visiting your town Write a letter to them and say Suggest what to bring Recommend where they should stay What places they should visit 73
- Cricket has become more popular than the national sports in the sub-continental countries.What do you think are the reasons behind this? 67
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language.Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 48.0 24.0651302605 199% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92076502732 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54007857436 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469945355191 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 5.43587174349 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6879982346 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.941176471 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278530482426 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100724523166 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494395721142 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180282644654 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454992548767 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.