Some people think that the government should take care of disadvantaged people such as the unemployed and homeless people. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Some people think that the government should take care of disadvantaged people such as the unemployed and homeless people. Do you agree or disagree?

It has been believed by some people that it would better if disadvantaged people could be looked after by Government. Every Nation’s Government have many big issues to resolve and Government do its best for its citizens irrespective of its ability or disability So I completely disagree with this belief.
The major factors that repels me to agree with this statement is that, this trend would over burden the Government. Government has to rule the country and take necessary decisions to the great economical and national issues. However, it cannot be avoided that being citizen of a country, these disadvantaged people should be taken good care. But there are non-profit organisations and NGO's that work for the benefits of homeless people and unemployed. These organisations get their funds from the Government. So the Government is involved indirectly. If we expect our Government Authorities to handle them directly, it would be over burden it in terms of money and responsibility.

Another significant factors that pushes me to disagree with this suggestion is that, this trend would encourage people to stay unemployed. As, people know that there is an agency to look after them, they would not worry about earning their bread and butter. This would discourage them to put efforts for employment. Further, this may increase the rate of unemployment nationwide. For an instance, Indian Government planned a free ration system for economical weaker sections of the society, but unfortunately the poor people never advantaged out of this plan, more misused than cherished.
In conclusion, People should advice some better ways to help disadvantaged people in a supreme manner and not making them reliant on the government. It is not the sole responsibility of Government but each individual can play a significant role to assist homeless and unemployed people. I disagree with the statement that these under privileged section of the society.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-22 Pritpal89 61 view
2019-07-13 bhatvishal@ 56 view
2019-07-13 bhatvishal@ 56 view
2019-06-15 bhatvishal@ 61 view
2019-05-19 harmankaur 67 view
Essays by user harmankaur :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ernment. Every Nation's Government have many big issues to resolve and Governme...
^^^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: GIVE_ADVISE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'advise' (a verb)?
Suggestion: advise
...herished. In conclusion, People should advice some better ways to help disadvantaged ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a supreme manner" with adverb for "supreme"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...etter ways to help disadvantaged people in a supreme manner and not making them reliant on the gove...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, so, as to, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29903536977 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01488743083 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56270096463 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0400101198 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9411764706 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11764705882 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300639152116 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865592204089 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664098425463 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195393769284 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654558969474 0.056905535591 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.