Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems.
To what extend do you agree?
Allocating national budget whether on construction roads and highways or developing the public transportation system has become a frequent subject of debate. While many people believe in building more and promoting roads, I think developing a hi-tech public transportation service is more efficient.
To begin with, obviously, perhaps the main problem of today’s world is air pollution which is caused by human activities and also industrial emission. In terms of that part of pollution which is due to car emission, public transportation is known as an effective measure to address. Indeed, providing people with a developed transportation system including an expanded network with more bus or train lanes and punctual timetable will reduce the air pollution significantly. Providing comfortable seats and easy access to the remote area encourage people to use public transportation instead of their own car. Secondly, the role that public transportation plays in reduction of traffic congestion, especially in megacities, is hard to be ignored. Take Istanbul as an illustrative example, which is a destination for many tourists from all around the world. Traffic jam in this kind of cities not only affect the citizens’ life but also might has negative impacts on the tourism industry.
Admittedly, it is true that more high quality roads and motorways may result in more safe communication and facilitate people travelling. Nevertheless, diverting governmental funding into these projects rather than promoting public transportation system may stimulate people to use their private cars which bring a new set of concerns. As mentioned before, air pollution is one of the potential problem that are certain to arise.
In conclusion, I think advantages associated with devoting budget to develop a hi-tech public transportation outnumber those because of road construction.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, i think, in conclusion, kind of, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62456140351 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2201734075 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621052631579 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1927156971 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.307692308 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252351955042 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860636780797 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668318691255 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168293121517 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486723700703 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.