Some people think that public libraries are not necessary today. Buy some feel that they r still providing some useful services. Discuss both the issues from your opinion.
In this era of technology where everything became handy and available at internet, it has been observed that use of libraries is getting decreased with every passing day. Although, most of the people are now use to of taking all information from internet, however, libraries have their own significance that cannot be overlooked or compromised.
As time passed, we can see new inventions which are making our lives easier in every form and same is the case with book reading. Initially people were used to of visiting libraries, sitting and spending their time there or borrow books as per their requirement but now you can see an evolution in this area as well. Now students can get any book or information from internet and instead of visiting libraries, they are going to net-cafe's to complete their assignments. Now even you can keep a whole lot of books in kindle or tablets. This is the reason people are assuming that conventional libraries are no more required.
On the contrary, there are people who are use to of reading books in library as they have their own point of view on this. As per them, reading a book by holding it gives a different feel and in library you are surrounded by such environment which let you focus on the subject and same cannot be obtained while reading on mobile or Kindle. As per them, most of the times, you got irrelevant information while looking something from internet whereas in library, you can get only relevant material as per your requirement. In addition to this, there are people who cannot afford to have mobile or internet connection so for them, only source of information/education is through these public libraries.
In my opinion, adopting technology is good but on the cost of letting your tradition go is not good at all. Libraries are pivotal for every age group and should be promoted along side internet cafes as it carries more focused approach
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'used'.
Suggestion: used
...y. Although, most of the people are now use to of taking all information from inter...
^^^
Line 2, column 494, Rule ID: WHOLE_LOT[1]
Message: Use simply 'lot'.
Suggestion: lot
...ir assignments. Now even you can keep a whole lot of books in kindle or tablets. This is ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...red. On the contrary, there are people who are use to of reading books in library as t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: BE_USE_TO_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... the contrary, there are people who are use to of reading books in library as they ...
^^^
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: ALONG_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'alongside'?
Suggestion: alongside
... every age group and should be promoted along side internet cafes as it carries more focus...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80547112462 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76490510727 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534954407295 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.9626489312 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.615384615 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112412216911 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461008024088 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309517275944 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723634371961 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01903630915 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.