Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Since the dawn of the Earth, the concept of good and bad exists. There is always a heated debate of how these punishments should be executed and to what extent. A group of people assert that punishments should be fixed while the other group is of the view that certain factors intact to crime should be kept in consideration before finalizing sentences. Before reaching to final verdict, let’s discuss both views in detail.
To begin with, there are certain laws which are formalized in absolute manner to punish a culprit. For instance, there should be no consideration for a murderer. Since considering their circumstances and making room for less punishment would encourage other people to commit crime. There has to be fixed and strict punishment for certain crimes like murder or rape attempts, particularly for murders as a person has killed a living human being and ended his life.
On the contrary, there is no denial to the thought that there should be considerable review to the circumstances in which a culprit committed crime. Whether he was not in his good mental state?. If a person has dome theft, was he starving to death or was he jobless?. We must understand the reasons for consideration as it will not only discourage people to commit more crimes but also eventually add value for society betterment. For instance, if a person is caught stealing money or food. Instead of putting that person behind the bars right away. Police should have reasons with that person that what made him attempt that crime. What were the factors that he was forced to steal things?
To put the things into perspective, laws are made for people by people and are always amendable. There should be some flexibility in punishments for the people who have sound reasons for committing crime. Also, Government organizations should work on the mitigation plans so that such situation does not occur again. We need to remember that hatred should only with crime not with the person committing it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, as for, as to, for instance, in fact, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93175074184 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66316135289 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528189910979 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6358919683 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.85 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 3.9879759519 376% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412842347277 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12319425351 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113462639871 0.0667982634062 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276685394143 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768706529933 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.