Some people think that radio is the best way to get news while other think television is better for this purpose. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is undeniable that the best way of getting news has been one of the most debatable issue in the world. Some people argue that radio is the best source of news, however, others believe that television is far more superior for this. This essay will examine both sides of this contentious matter. Personally, I strongly advocate for the adoption that television is a better way of getting news.
On the one hand, proponents of radio news claim that radio news has wider coverage. A fundamental reason for this is that people can listen to radio from basically almost everywhere, be it on the bus, car, train or while even walking. There is ample of evidence to suggest that news from radio reaches more people. For example, a recent report by Statista showed that roughly 220 million people in the US listen to radio news due to wider coverage.
However, on the other hand, television is more visual. It offer sight and motion which generate an emotional response from viewers. People are moved by what they see, so when news is been reported and people are seeing pictures of the events occurring, it gives them a picture of how good or bad the situation happening is. For instance, a survey by BBC showed that 80% of people in the UK watch news on television because they want to have a pictorial view of events unfolding.
To conclude, radio is a good source of news because it has a wide reach, however, I believe that television is the best way of getting news as it provide its audience with visual content of events happening.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'offers'?
Suggestion: offers
...her hand, television is more visual. It offer sight and motion which generate an emot...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ws because it has a wide reach, however, I believe that television is the best wa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65201465201 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43829511015 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531135531136 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7313865106 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6923076923 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374994935172 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133757150749 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073542959461 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226021480349 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961093053284 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.