Children of this generation are growing up in mixed environment unlike few centuries ago. This calls for necessity of ascertaining responsibility of teaching them to be valuable member of society. Few people opine, behaviour and character moulding are integral part of parenting while others think that only schools are perfect places to ensure positive upbringing. Though I respect former statement, but as a millennial kid, my support is to inculcate duties of ideal citizen in academic institutional level. In this essay, we will discuss various theories and elucidate perfect strategy to achieve this.
Earlier, boys and girls used to spend most of their time with their parents and by playing. Whereas, with modern education, this situation changed. Nearly half of childhood is now with schoolmates and teachers, thus giving little time for family members to supervise them. Pedagogy experts demonstrate this situation in theory of ‘Modern parenting and teaching’ where learning starts at house but evolve in schools’. In kerala, according to survey, more than 20% of rural women and 45% urban working parents rely on schools for disciplining their kids. European Countries like Finland, as an example, prefer to have a separate subject on moral sciences are said to be having best education system in the world. Traditional method following third world nations, on the other hand, reputed with low literacy and unemployment.
Several years ago, when most of world is agrarian society, parenting was not complicated as these days. Perhaps, industrial revolution changed scenario where both parents started working and called for need of external help which later popularly known as child care centres. As per child psychologists, who debunked old methodologies, late marriages lead to generational gaps between father and son making way to have different norms and customs for upbringing. In no way, parents can be expected to adjust this new attitude, hence again making schools as best option. Surely, old methods of their own advantages like close contact with relatives, familiarity while teaching values. Nevertheless, they are not enough to sum-up whole situation.
In conclusion, though parents have first hand information on their young ones, it’s not their sole responsibility of to teach good behaviour. In general, society has obligation to help children to grow up as beloved citizen and educational organisation have additional duty of addressing this need. Afterall, today’s children are tomorrow citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...ing and teaching’ where learning starts at house but evolve in schools’. In kerala...
^^
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'having the best'.
Suggestion: having the best
...ubject on moral sciences are said to be having best education system in the world. Traditio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: After all
...dditional duty of addressing this need. Afterall, today’s children are tomorrow citizens...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, nevertheless, so, third, thus, whereas, while, in conclusion, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2153.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52051282051 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87406160542 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 176.041082164 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679487179487 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6506196629 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.523809524 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241757145054 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647573434978 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534867496908 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144952577783 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540481128656 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.