Some people think schools should select students according to their academic ability, but others believe students with different abilities should be educated together. Discuss both views and give your opinion
Certainly, it is a fact that all students are skilled and talented with different abilities. However, some people believe that education system is well effective and will provide more facilities only when the schools select students as per their academic abilities but some say that students with different abilities should be educated together. Both these views are analysed before a conclusion is derived.
Firstly, on the note of positive aspects on educating the mixed ability students together are that, by following this method students would able to give their hidden creativity within themselves. For example, if a non-singer brilliant student is put in a class where many singers and other creative students study together, then that student can generate singing ability inside him/her joining others. Additionally, vice-versa may also occur deliberately when some weak non-attentive students are kept in a class with talented scholars, it will help them to develop their skills.
On the other hand, it will be easier for the lecturer to stream the students if they are at the same level of ability. For instance, if in a class all the students are with higher academic ability then it will make the tutor easier to teach them at once and students would be able grab faster. Similarly the students with lower academic ability required to be concentrated more by the lecturer compared to top grade students. Also it is believed that this would lead successful future career.
In conclusion, I firmly agree with the aforementioned statement that students with different abilities should be taught together to built variety of talents among all the students. Though it makes little hard for the school to get all the talents into academic ranking, mixed-ability oriented classes should be encouraged in schools as it will benefit all students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ysed before a conclusion is derived. Firstly, on the note of positive aspects...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l help them to develop their skills. On the other hand, it will be easier for...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 295, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...and students would be able grab faster. Similarly the students with lower academic abilit...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 427, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ecturer compared to top grade students. Also it is believed that this would lead suc...
^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ols as it will benefit all students.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, similarly, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34006734007 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70849418995 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5972000682 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.166666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9166666667 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.459071637194 0.244688304435 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166327262617 0.084324248473 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106360522074 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293908309031 0.151304729494 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111115364898 0.056905535591 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.