Nowadays, most of the people worldwide agreed on that sugar is harmful for the health. It creates a genuine concern in modern society and I firmly believe that it has to be a matter of personal decision to reduce daily usage of sugary products, without counting on governments support. Furthermore, this essay will elaborate two opposite opinions in order to prove it.
On the one hand, the government is a main lawful structure in every country and it has power to make certain restrictions towards sugar production. Namely, it can implement specific laws, which will limit the amount of sugar used in production of sweet food items. Moreover, they can set a list of products, which should be made without adding of that unhealthy component. In general, the state's administration has a political power to limit and make some restrictions in production of sweet products, but it cannot completely exclude sugar from our lives.
On the other hand, it is responsibility of every person to lessen sugar intake. There is no point to prohibit the usage of the products, which contain sugar, as most of them will lose their attractiveness and taste. For example, a chocolate cake will become too bitter without adding sugar and a classic ice-cream will become just a frozen milk. Also, sugar itself can has some benefits, for example in adequate amount it gives energy and power, to those who are tired but have no time for rest. From this perspective, it has no harm for the health till people will start to overuse it. Considering the above, it is only personal concern whether it needed to use sugar in wise amount or to eliminate it from the diet.
In conclusion, by observing different perceptions of the same issue, it has become obvious that it is only individual responsibility to limit the consumption of sugar, as it is not as harmful as it seems, so the government has no right to ban it.
- Today, it is very common to have people from two different generations mix in the same workplace. Are there more advantages or disadvantages to this situation? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples. 78
- Your friend had made a plan for you to see a movie together but you cannot now not join him. You've found another friend who can go instead of you.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter:Explain why you cannot go anymoreSay who can go instead o 78
- Some believe it is the responsibility of government to take care of the environment, others think people are responsible for it. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- Shopping is now one of the most popular forms of leisure activity in many countries for young adults.Why is this?Is it positive/negative development?Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?------------------------------------------------ 84
- You have missed some important papers accidently in a taxi.Write a letter to the manager of the Taxi company. In your letter:⦁ Give the details of your journey⦁ Explain why those papers are important for you⦁ Suggest what can the manager do 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'states'' or 'state's'?
Suggestion: states'; state's
...at unhealthy component. In general, the states administration has a political power to...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...t a frozen milk. Also, sugar itself can has some benefits, for example in adequate ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, as to, for example, in conclusion, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82568807339 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75258238376 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532110091743 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6743494648 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.714285714 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209890655243 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735410790277 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469741510172 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127892232227 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332031376327 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.