The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.

The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Owing to the atomic energy in today era is a great blessing. However, it is generally argued that the nuclear mechanism has more pros as compared to cons. I tend to agree partially with this very notion.

In the first place, the fear of atomic war and its ultimate results is the biggest source to reduce the chances of war among countries. Nations clearly know if they start a war they have to face the consequences as a nuclear war. For instance, the Second World War in japan clearly left a strong message in this regard. Therefore, atomic power is a good way to retain peaceful environment of the world.

In addition to the previous point, atomic energy is also a cheapest source to acquire tidy power resources. This type of energy can easily boost up the economic growth by facilitating each and every department of life. Nuclear technology can guarantee least cost in obtaining the increased energy requirements along with provision of clean power. Thus, nuclear power can easily fulfill the energy need with least investment.

Nevertheless, the access and use of atomic power could not be allowed to everyone because a single mistake can lead to the large scale destruction. If this technology is permitted unchecked the world has to face the horrible results because there are many countries whom atomic technology is not safe for the rest of the world. Hence a strict eye should be kept in the use of nuclear mechanism.

To recapitulate, although the atomic power provides so many comforts to man but the other side cannot denied. The countries should make a universal rule in this scenario.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-12 Misbah Nazir 84 view
2019-09-12 Misbah Nazir 78 view
2019-09-12 Misbah Nazir 78 view
2019-09-12 Misbah Nazir 78 view
2019-09-12 Misbah Nazir 73 view
Essays by user Misbah Nazir :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 58, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...e previous point, atomic energy is also a cheapest source to acquire tidy power r...
^
Line 9, column 243, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'guarantee the least'.
Suggestion: guarantee the least
...artment of life. Nuclear technology can guarantee least cost in obtaining the increased energy ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 403, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the least'.
Suggestion: with the least
...ower can easily fulfill the energy need with least investment. Nevertheless, the a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 329, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... is not safe for the rest of the world. Hence a strict eye should be kept in the use ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, as to, for instance, in addition, in the first place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95255474453 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62238912374 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57299270073 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2287799227 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8125 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167004840081 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545446923815 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481761255811 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858429240157 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295890298416 0.056905535591 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.