Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Gender equality has always sparked heated controversy. Some commentators are of the view that the traditional approach always confined the men as the breadwinner for their family and the women are considered to be taken care for house chores and upbringing of their children, hence both should be given equal opportunities to get educated in renowned universities; other people oppose this idea. this essay will argue on both sides and I shall hold the opposite opinion.

To begin with, there are many arguments to support the idea that men and women should be allocated with the same number of admissions in educational institutions. this is because, in our anti-feminist society men have always given the precedence over the women rights, which leads to gender discrimination and imbalanced education in both sexes. Firstly, if the candid opportunities have not been given to both the candidates, then we are demolishing the virtuous of female students. To illustrate, a recent survey from a sociological organization has revealed that 2 out of each 10 females are struggling with their own family members for the right of advanced and higher education. Secondly, numerous evidence proves that the girls are equally brilliant as the boys are; if girls are not being educated, then we are losing the talent and giving the unfair chance to boys only. For example, as per the recent statistics from the University of America, count for the feminine scientists in western countries has been risen by 30% in last decade, unfortunately, in Asian countries, it has been fallen by 40%. Thereby, in male dominating society, females deserve the uniform distribution, be it an educational or a job opportunity.

On the other hand, apart from the concerns expressed above, I strongly believe that the admission process should be based on a fair chance of grade system and the area of interest of the candidates. educational bodies should aim for the talent hunt, applicants must be shortlisted on the basis of their rank achieved in their entrance exams. For instance, most of the universities announce the cut-off rate of high ranked students to get admissions in their institution. Furthermore, course suitability should be based upon the field of interest, despite the sex factor. In particular, male nominees for fashion designing course are surging in the last few years, which is the true opposition of the conservative thought.

To recapitulate, our society has always been biased for the male contender, however, by applying the stringent laws these situations can be curbed. Nonetheless, recognizing the right talent and deserving candidates is more cautious.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-22 jdsmss 73 view
2019-11-28 Farzana Akter 73 view
2019-10-25 morbymuku 61 view
2019-10-08 Jayant Chohda 56 view
2019-10-06 amirfaie 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 397, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...rsities; other people oppose this idea. this essay will argue on both sides and I sh...
^^^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...admissions in educational institutions. this is because, in our anti-feminist societ...
^^^^
Line 12, column 200, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Educational
...the area of interest of the candidates. educational bodies should aim for the talent hunt, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, then, apart from, for example, for instance, in particular, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2269.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 427.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31381733021 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98054063262 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.5488407146 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.470588235 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1176470588 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6470588235 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101832367252 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336750501451 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0216520541854 0.0667982634062 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0583156377241 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230647876839 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.