Violence in the media promotes violence in society.
To what extent do you agree?
Mass media plays an important role in the public. However, some community workers argue that is cruel episodes in media can encourage members of society to act abnormally. This essay disagrees with their point of view.
Let us start with the reasons why sociologist think that cruel scenes in media cause violence in society. The first cause is that young people take the atrocity on TV for granted. Scenes of violence may convince the youth to believe that assaulting others is normal in society. Another argument is that it encourages some parents to abuse their children. Watching how parents ruthlessly treat families on TV shows may motivate people to act the same against their household members. Furthermore, the fear of being violated as the victims of cruelty on mass media frequently encourage people to carry weapons as a measure of self-defense. People tend to want to protect themselves as well as their relatives by either guns or knives, when they watch violent scenes on television, but this redundant protection often tempt the owners to use it in petty scuffles.
Nevertheless, some media presenters advocate the idea that the effect of violence on TV screens is exaggerated by sociologists. First of all, there are other sources of violence in life. Media shows brutal conduct, but they may have a low psychological effect in comparison to other sources of information. Secondly, well-bred people tend to avoid watching programs, which encourage cruelty. Mentally stable people usually prefer to resolve disagreements peacefully, no matter whether they watch TV programs narrating violent stories. Finally, violent behavior described in media can teach audience what is unacceptable in a health society. Some young people, for instance, are unaware of what abnormal behavior is in the public; however, such shows can enlighten them about it.
In conclusion, although some social workers believe that cruelty displayed on TV causes atrocious behavior in real world, I think that cruelty can occur regardless of what is highlighted on media outlets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | avneet28 | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | lokeshpareek87 | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-21 | being | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | mohammed123 | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | mohammed123 | 56 | view |
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local businesses are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business bring about the death of local communities.To what extent do you agree o 73
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local businesses are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business bring about the death of local communities.To what extent do you agree o 78
- A friend you met last year has invited you to visit him/her in his/her country. You have never been there before and need some information before you leave.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter:request advise about a gift for his/her familyask abo 56
- You and your family are living in rented accommodation in an English speaking country. You are not satisfied with the condition of some of the furniture.Write a letter to your landlord. In your letter introduce yourself explain what is wrong with the furn 78
- Levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world What are the reasons for this and suggest some solutions 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31003039514 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78149548633 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568389057751 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8733518229 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0555555556 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2777777778 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173265005828 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588167962948 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647755081409 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098506237212 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424862513447 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.