Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters.
Do agree or disagree?
Rich countries should offer humanitarian help to unwealthy nations during natural calamities. This essay strongly agrees with this statement as poor countries do not have enough resources to provide their citizens and it also helps build a healthy relationship with wealthy countries.
Firstly, citizens of poorer countries do not receive much help from their nation because their government have limited or less money. When natural calamities occur in any country, its people face heavy losses and expect their political bodies rush to their aid and offer the necessary resources. Therefore, rich countries must offer charitable relief items or wealth to poor nations. For instance, when Bangladesh was flooded because of tsunami, Khalsa-aid group from Indian government came to rescue the people and provided them necessary shelter, clothing and food for survival.
Secondly, by offering humanitarian help both nations develop friendly relations. Such healthy understanding is required so that both countries continue to aid for one another during the time of need. Strong relationships between the two nations will lead to a better society and can avoid conflicts as well as cold war. A recent research stated that Canada always offers assistance to many other countries during catastrophic events and therefore this nation has no enemies. Almost all other countries maintain a good connection with Canada.
In conclusion, the countries that are well-to-do must lend a helping hand to poverty-stricken countries because the latter are unable to offer relief aid to its people and it also helps the countries correlate with each other in the near future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5234375 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7610639473 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8376204015 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.833333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305360781848 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110110119645 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784957158942 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190525878039 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822569871654 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.