63. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People can solve important problems by themselves or with the help from their family members so there’s no need for the government to help them.
By and large, human beings have always relied on the help they received from others around them. In this regard, advice from other people has a decisive role in people's decisions when they face problems in their lives. Nonetheless, some people believe that people should rely on themselves and their families in their hurdles instead of counting on governments to help them reduce their burden. I entirely disagree with this statement, and I posit that people should ask governments for help. In what follows, I will elaborate on two reasons to substantiate my perspective.
To begin with, I contend that many problems are so extensive that people can not solve them by themselves. To be more specific, I should mention that people face an inordinate number of challenges in their lives in today's hectic world. As a result, it may be hugely cumbersome for them to take action on their problems without any help from superior powers. For example, natural catastrophes such as earthquakes or floods have such devastating repercussions that even it is difficult for governments to solve them. As a result, it may be impossible for people to find solutions for these disasters only by themselves or with the help of their families. Adding to that, people should demand support from governments since it is the responsibility of people in power to help the commons and make their efforts to reduce their problems.
In addition, my conviction is that governments can solve problems more effectively since they have access to a tremendous amount of information and possess enough power to take immediate action. Consequently, it may be a more prudent course of action to ask for help from professional people trained to respond appropriately in critical situations. Conversely, people tend to undergo a considerable amount of pressure and stress when they face struggles, reducing their functionality and rationale. Meanwhile, experts who work in governmental roles are exposed to abundant similar cases in their daily routines. As a result, it is more convenient for them to overcome a problem that may seem too complicated for ordinary people to solve since they have access to their immense asset of experiences gained through many years. In this regard, not only is asking help from governments more practical, but also it can reduce people's tension and stress in the time of hardships.
According to the reasons mentioned above, it is a foregone conclusion that people should rely on governmental aids in solving their problems. It is only by the help from governments that people can solve large-scale problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-06 | false_shakespeare | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-24 | sam0506 | 68 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Amin1990 | 70 | view |
| 2018-10-09 | hughesmiao | 88 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by email they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- salinity in a lake 83
- 65 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To solve present and future problems it is necessary to understand the past 83
- Plain of jars TPO 59 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, if, may, nonetheless, so, while, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, by and large, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2196.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15492957746 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90525369274 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478873239437 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.040681846 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.578947368 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4210526316 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63157894737 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4034263792 0.236089414692 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143720186817 0.076458572812 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087685756084 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274954605243 0.150856017488 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715482759264 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.