The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Some people argue that the ability to make new friend easily is so crucial, On the other hand, I believe that the ability to maintain friends with a small number of friends for long period of time is more important for the following reasons.
To begin with, the relationship between the old friends and me is significant stronger than the new friend. This is because we know each other very well. My friend named is Toey. She is my best friend and also she knows me very better than I know myself. Therefore, when I have problem that I can not solve, I usually consult with Toey. Moreover, I always feel comfortable when I talk with old friends like Toey. In contrast, I am not a talkative person, so I am not good at making new friends and I do not want too since I believe that the number of friends is not important. The quality is more considerably vital than the quantity. Consequently, in my life, there are only a few friends, but they understand me than everyone else.
On the contrary, the ability to make new friends easily is not essential if the friend that you made is not true friends. How can we trust new friend? We just only know each other. Sometimes, they want to be your friends for some reasons. For instance, they might be want to be your friend because you have plenty of money. Hence, you should be careful when you make new friends.
To sum up, I believe that the ability to maintain friendship with a small group is more important than the ability to make new friend as old friend is the friend that know you better than others. They are someone who always with you no matter who you are. A friend indeed is a friend in need.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- TPO-3 Integrated writing 3
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and 70
- TPO3 - Integrated Writing 3
- It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. 60
- TPO-3 Integrated writing 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...at the ability to maintain friends with a small number of friends for long period of time is more...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...with a small number of friends for long period of time is more important for the following rea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, in contrast, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1977.66487455 69% => OK
No of words: 308.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41233766234 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35103274121 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 409.5 618.680645161 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.0895685442 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.5263157895 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2105263158 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.10526315789 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393596114783 0.236089414692 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118151788969 0.076458572812 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140930215151 0.0737576698707 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305920909504 0.150856017488 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158588099168 0.0645574589148 246% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 11.7677419355 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 58.1214874552 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.1575268817 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.0 10.9000537634 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.12 8.01818996416 76% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 86.8835125448 38% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.