All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is

Essay topics:

All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.

History is a science which tells about culture and people of countries and nations all over the world. Some people may hold the view that students of all majors are needed to take history courses in all universities. However, some others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that… From my own perspective, the latter belief is true. In what follows, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind to substantiate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that for a student his major and its courses are important than history. He should spend his time studying his specific courses. They take most of his time, hence he does not have enough time to spend unnecessary course. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was a student in a medical school, I was forced to take a history course about my country. As a student, I did not enough time to study this course since y professors gave me a lot of assignment about my major. I had to do some experiments in the laboratory. as a result, I did not take much time to study the course and I passed the exam with the lowest grade. Not only did not learn this course but also I caused to decrease my GPA.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that students pass their courses to find a decent job in the future, hence passing history course does not help them be successful in their careers.in this competitive world, companies are willing to employ a one who is professional in his major. For instance, my cousin took some unrelated course during studying at the university. He told it is funny and interesting knowing about other majors. Unfortunately, after graduation, he was not able to find a decent job associated with his major and finally he became a clerk in a small company. Had he took his own major courses normally, he would not have difficulty finding a good job.
In conclusion, this is my deep belief that taking history course not only is a sheer waste of time but also it not add useful knowledge about a student major. Therefore, I highly suggest that it is better not to take a history course during education and student should take their own major courses.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-06 maryka72 60 view
2023-03-14 sonyeoso 76 view
2023-02-04 Ben Edward 90 view
2022-12-19 mooha2 70 view
2022-12-19 mooha2 70 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind substantiating'.
Suggestion: mind substantiating
...ng reasons. The first reason coming to mind to substantiate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 629, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
... do some experiments in the laboratory. as a result, I did not take much time to s...
^^
Line 3, column 599, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[4]
Message: Possible agreement error – use past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...came a clerk in a small company. Had he took his own major courses normally, he woul...
^^^^
Line 4, column 116, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adds'?
Suggestion: adds
...s a sheer waste of time but also it not add useful knowledge about a student major....
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, as for, for instance, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61734693878 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6021558598 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494897959184 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 580.5 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.702010932 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254103657451 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828482688633 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742680783395 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178471542126 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493924704185 0.0645574589148 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.